Hebrew · Jerusalem Talmud, ed. Guggenheimer (Hebrew/Aramaic)הלכה: רִבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר אוֹמֵר. אִם לֹא הֵבִיא כְלִי כול׳. אָמַר רִבִּי יוֹחָנָן. הֲוִינָן סָבְרִין מֵימַר. בְּכָל הַדְּבָרִים חָלוּק רִבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר. מִמַּה שֶׁצָּרַךְ רִבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר לִדרוֹשׁ בִּיכּוּרִין. מַה בִּיכּוּרִין שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר בָּעוֹמֶר דּוֹחִין הַשַּׁבָּת. אַף בִּיכּוּרִין שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר בִּשְׁתֵּי הַלֶּחֶם דּוֹחִין אֶת הַשַּׁבָּת. הָדָא אָמְרָה. לֹֹא בְכָל הַדְּבָרִים חָלוּק רִבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר. אָמַר רִבִּי שְׁמוּאֵל בַּר רַב יִצְחָק. בְּכָל הַדְּבָרִים חָלוּק רִבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר. וְלָמָּה צָרַךְ רִבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר לִדרוֹשׁ בִּיכּוּרִין בִּיכּוּרִין. אֶלָּא עַל יְדֵי שֶׁעִיקַּר דְּחִיָיתָן שַׁבָּת וּמַכְשִׁירֵיהֶן מְלָאכָה. הָתִיבוֹן. וְהָתַנֵי. לוּלָב וּמַכְשִׁירָיו דּוֹחִין אֶת הַשַּׁבָּת. אָמַר רִבִּי יוֹנָה. לַהֲבִיאוֹ מֵרֹאשׁ הַדֶּקֶל. וְהָתַנֵי. שׁוֹפָר וּמַכְשִׁירָיו דּוֹחִין אֶת הַשַּׁבָּת. לַהֲבִיאוֹ מִחוּץ לִתְחוּם. וְתַנֵּי כֵן. אֵין מְגָרְדִין וְלֹא מְגָרְדִין וְלֹא מְפָרְכִין. תַּנֵּי בְּשֵׁם רִבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר. לוּלָב וּמַכְשִׁירָיו דּוֹחִין אֶת הַשַּׁבָּת. אָמַר רִבִּי יוֹנָה. סָלְקַת מַתְנִיתָא. תַּנֵּי. מַעֲשֶׂה הָיָה וְהוֹרָה רִבִּי כְּרִבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר. אָמַר רִבִּי יוֹחָנָן. חֲבוּרָה הָיְתָה מַקְשָׁה. מַה רָאָה רִבִּי לְהַנִּיחַ דִּבְרֵי חֲכָמִים וְלַעֲשׂוֹת כְּרִבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר. אָמַר רִבִּי הוֹשַׁעְיָה. שָׁאַלְנוּ אֶת רִבִּי יְהוּדָה הַגּוֹזֵר וְאָמַר לָנוּ. בְּמָבוֹי שֶׁאֵינוֹ מְפוּלָּשׁ. כְּהָדָא תַנִּינָן. אָסוּר לְטַלְטֵל מִתּוֹכוֹ לַבָּתִּים וּמִן הַבָּתִּים לְתוֹכוֹ. אָמַר רִבִּי אַבָּהוּ. קִיַימְתִּיהָ בְתִינּוֹק וּבְאִוזְמֶל שֶׁשָּׁבְתוּ בְּמָבוּי. וְאֵינוֹ אָסוּר לְטַלְטְלוֹ בְּכָל הַמָּבוֹי.
English · Heinrich W. GuggenheimerHALAKHAH: “Rebbi Eliezer says, if one did not bring the implement,” etc. Rebbi Joḥanan said, we were of the opinion to say that Rebbi Eliezer disagrees in all cases. Since Rebbi Eliezer needed to explain “first fruits;” since “first fruits” mentioned with the ˋomer push the Sabbath aside, so also “first fruits” mentioned with the Two Breads push the Sabbath aside; this implies that Rebbi Eliezer does not disagree in all cases. Rebbi Samuel ben Rav Isaac said, Rebbi Eliezer disagrees in all cases, and why did Rebbi Eliezer have to explain “first fruits” “first fruits”? Only because their essence pushes aside the Sabbath but their enabling actions are work. They objected, did we not state, the lulav and its enabling actions push the Sabbath aside? Rebbi Jonah said, to bring it from the top of the palm tree. But did we not state, the shofar and its enabling actions push the Sabbath aside? To bring it from outside the Sabbath boundary. And was it stated so: One does not scratch, and one does not scratch, and one does not break off. It was stated in the name of Rebbi Eliezer: The lulav and its enabling actions push the Sabbath aside. Rebbi Jonah said, the baraita was finished. It was stated: It happened that Rebbi instructed following Rebbi Eliezer. Rebbi Joḥanan said, the company was asking, what reason did Rebbi have to disregard the words of the Sages and to act following Rebbi Eliezer? Rebbi Hoshaia said, we asked Rebbi Jehudah the circumciser and he told us, it was about a dead-end street, as we had stated that it is forbidden to move from it into the houses and from the houses into it. Rebbi Abbahu said, I explained it about a baby and a knife being in the dead-end street on the Sabbath; and it is not forbidden to move in the entire dead-end street.