Jerusalem Talmud Ketubot 3.4

משנה: נַעֲרָה שֶׁנִּתְאָרְסָה אוֹ שֶׁנִּתְגָּרְשָׁה רִבִּי יוֹסֵי הַגָּלִילִי אוֹמֵר אֵין לָהּ קְנָס. רִבִּי עֲקִיבָה אוֹמֵר יֵשׁ לָהּ קְנָס וּקְנָסָהּ שֶׁל עַצְמָהּ.

MISHNAH: If an adolescent girl had been preliminarily married but was divorced, Rebbi Yose the Galilean says she cannot collect the fine; Rebbi Aqiba says, she can collect the fine and it belongs to her.

הלכה: נַעֲרָה שֶׁנִּתְאָרְסָה כול׳. מַאי טַעֲמָא דְּרִבִּי יוֹסֵי הַגָּלִילִי. אֲשֶׁר לֹא אוֹרָשָׂה.

HALAKHAH: “An adolescent girl who had been preliminarily married,” etc. What is the reason of Rebbi Yose the Galilean? “Who was not preliminarily married.”

עַד שֶׁלֹּא נִתְאָרְסָה נוֹתֵן לְאָבִיהָ. נִתְאָרְסָה נוֹתֵן לְעַצְמָהּ. עַל דַּעְתֵּיהּ דְּרִבִּי יוֹסֵי הָגָּלִילִי. נַעֲרָה נוֹתֵן לְאָבִיהָ. בּוֹגֶרֶת נוֹתֵן לְעַצְמָהּ. בְּתוּלָה נוֹתֵן לְאָבִיהָ. מוּכַּת עֵץ נוֹתֵן לְעַצְמָהּ. שַׁנְיָיא הִיא דִכְתִיב נַעֲרָה. נַעֲרָה וְלֹא בוֹגֶרֶת. בְּתוּלָה. בְּתוּלָה וְלֹא מוּכַּת עֵץ. לֵּית כְּתִיב אֲשֶׁר לֹא אוֹרָסָה. אֲשֶׁר לֹא אוֹרָסָה מְלַמֵּד הֵימֶינָּה לִגְזֵירָה שָׁוָה. מַה תַּמָּן חֲמִשִּׁין אַף הָכָא חֲמִשִּׁין. וְלֵית לֵיהּ לְרִבַּי יוֹסֵי חֲמִשִּׁין. אִית לֵיהּ כֶּסֶף כֶּסֶף. מַה כֶּסֶף שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר לְהַלָּן חֲמִשִּׁין. אַף כָּאן חֲמִשִּׁין.

Before she was preliminarily married, he gives to her father; after she had been preliminarily married, he gives to herself. In the opinion of Rebbi Yose the Galilean, if she is an adolescent, he gives to her father; if she is an adult, does he give it to herself? If she is a virgin, he gives to her father; if she is injured by wood, does he give it to herself? It is different, because it is written “an adolescent”, adolescent but not adult. “A virgin,” a virgin not one injured by wood. Is it not written “who was not preliminarily married,” “who was not preliminarily married,” to infer from there by an equal cut? Since in one case it is 50, so in the other case it is 50. Does Rebbi Yose not have “50”? He has “silver, silver”. Since “silver” written at one place is 50, so “silver” [written at the other place] also is 50.

בָּא עָלֶיהָ עַד שֶׁלֹּא נִתְאָרְסָה וְנִתְאָרְסָה וְנִתְגָּרְשָׁה. לֵית מִילְתָא דְרִבִּי אַחַי אָמְרָה שֶׁהוּא נוֹתֵן. וְהָתַנֵּי תַּחַת אֲשֶׁר עִינָּהּ. לְרַבּוֹת אֶת הַיְּתוֹמָה לִקְנָס. דִּבְרֵי רִבִּי יוֹסֵי הַגָּלִילִי. אָמַר רִבִּי אַחַי. תִּיפְתָּר שֶׁבָּא עָלֶיהָ עַד שֶׁלֹּא מֵת אָבִיהָ וּמֵת אָבִיהָ כְּבָר נִרְאֶה לִיתֵּן לְאָבִיהָ. הוּא בָא עָלֶיהָ עַד שֶׁלֹּא מֵת אָבִיהָ וּמֵת אָבִיהָ וְהוּא בָא עָלֶיהָ עַד שֶׁלֹּא נִתְאָרְסָה וְנִתְגָּרְשָׁה. רִבִּי זְעִירָא אָמַר רַב חִסְדָּא בְעָא. בָּא עָלֶיהָ עַד שֶׁלֹּא נִישֵּׂאת וְנִישֵּׂאת. מִמַּה דְתֵימַר תַּמָּן תַּחַת בַּעֲלָהּ הִיא הוּא נוֹתֵן לְאָבִיהָ. וָכָא תַּחַת בַּעֲלָהּ הִיא הוּא נוֹתֵן לְאָבִיהָ.

If he came to her before she was preliminarily married, then she was preliminarily married and divorced. Does the statement of Rebbi Aḥai not imply that he pays? Did we not state: “For he had mistreated her,” to include the orphan for the fine, the words of Rebbi Yose the Galilean. Rebbi Aḥai said, explain it that he came to her before her father died; when subsequently her father died he already was obligated to give to her father. One came to her before her father died and subsequently her father died; one came to her before she was preliminarily married, subsequently she was divorced. Rebbi Ze‘ira said that Rav Ḥisda asked: If one came to her before she was married and then she was married? Since you say there, she is under her husband but he has to pay to her father, so in this case she is under her husband but he has to pay to her father.