Jerusalem Talmud Ketubot 1.6

משנה: הַנּוֹשֵׂא אֶת הָאִשָּׁה וְלֹא מָצָא לָהּ בְּתוּלִים הִיא אוֹמֶרֶת מִשֶׁאֵירַסְתַּנִי נֶאֱנַסְתִּי וְנִסְתַּחֲפָה שָׂדֵהוּ וְהוּא אוֹמֵר לֹא כִּי אֶלָּא עַד שֶׁלֹּא אֵירַסְתִּיךְ וְהָיָה מִקְחִי מֶקַח טָעוּת. רַבָּן גַּמְלִיאֵל וְרִבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר אוֹמֵר נֶאֱמֶנֶת. רִבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ אוֹמֵר לֹא מִפִּיהָ אָנוּ חַיִּין אֶלָּא הֲרֵי זוֹ בְחֶזְקַת בְּעוּלָה עַד שֶׁלֹּא תִּתְאָרֵס וְהִיטְעָתוֹ עַד שֶׁתָּבִיא רְאָיָיה לִדְבָרֶיהָ.

MISHNAH: Somebody married a woman and found that she was no virgin. She says, I was raped after you had married me preliminarily, so your field was flooded. He says not so, but it happened before I married you preliminarily; therefore, my acquisition was made in error. Rabban Gamliel and Rebbi Eliezer say, she is believed. Rebbi Joshua said, we do not live off her mouth but there is a presumption that she had sexual relations before she was preliminarily married unless she provides proof of her statement.

הלכה: הַנּוֹשֵׂא אִשָּׁה וְלֹא מָצָא לָהּ בְּתוּלִים כול׳. רִבִּי יִרְמְיָה בָּעֵי. מֵעַתָּה אֵין טַעֲנַת בְּתוּלִים לֹא כְרַבָּן גַּמְלִיאֵל וּכְרִבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר אֶלָּא כְרִבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ. וְחָזַר וְאָמַר. יֵשׁ טַעֲנַת בְּתוּלִים כְּרַבָּן גַּמְלִיאֵל וּכְרִבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר בְּשׁוֹתֶקֶת. וַאֲפִילוּ תֵימֵר בִּמְדַבֶּרֶת. בְּאוֹמֶרֶת. מָצָא וְאִיבֵּד. וּתְהֵא נֶאֱמֶנֶת. לֵית יְכִיל. דְּאָמַר רִבִּי אִילָא בְשֵׁם רִבִּי לָעְזָר. מָצָא פֶּתַח פָּתוּחַ אָסוּר לְקַיְימָהּ מִשּׁוּם סְפֵק סוֹטָה. הָכָא אִיתְמַר נֶאֱמֶנֶת. וְהָכָא אִיתְמַר אֵינָהּ נֶאֱמֶנֶת. תַּמָּן שְׁנֵיהֶן מוֹדִין בְּשֶׁהַפֶּתַח פָּתוּחַ.

HALAKHAH: “Somebody married a woman and found that she was no virgin”, etc. Rebbi Jeremiah asked: Does this mean that a claim of missing virginity is impossible following Rabban Gamliel and Rebbi Eliezer, only following Rebbi Joshua? He turned around and said, a claim of missing virginity is possible following Rabban Gamliel and Rebbi Eliezer, if she remains silent. And even if you say that she talks, if she said that he found her a virgin and destroyed the evidence. Why should she not be believed? One cannot tolerate it, since Rebbi Hila said in the name of Rebbi Eleazar, if he found the door open, he is forbidden to keep her because she might have been unfaithful. Here you say, she is believed. There, you say that she is not believed. In this case, both agree that the door was open.

תַּמָּן תַּנִּינָן. הָיוּ בָהּ מוּמִין וְעוֹדָהּ בְּבֵית אָבִיהָ הָאָב צָרִיךְ לְהָבִיא רְאָיָיה. רִבִּי לָעְזָר שָׁאַל לְרִבִּי יוֹחָנָן. מַתְנִיתָא דְרַבָּן גַּמְלִיאֵל וְרִבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר דְּלֹא כְרִבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ. אָמַר לֵיהּ. דִּבְרֵי הַכֹּל הִיא. שֶׁנְיָיא הִיא מוּמִין שֶׁדַּרְכָּן לְהִיוָולֵד. אָמַר רִבִּי יוֹסֵי. מִקַּמָּא דְנָן חֲמֵיי רַבָּנִן מְדַמּוּ מִוּמִין לִבְתוּלִין. אִילֵּין יָלְפִין מִן אִילֵּין וְאִילֵּין יָ‍לְפִין מִן אִילֵּין. מוּמִין מִבְּתוּלִים. שֶׁאִם בָּא עָלֶיהָ עוֹדָהּ בְּבֵית אָבִיהָ צָרִיךְ הָאָב לְהָבִיא רְאָיָיה. בְּתוּלִים מִמּוּמִין. שֶׁאִם נוֹלְדוּ לָהּ מוּמִין סָפֵק מִשְׁנִּכְנְסָה לִרְשׁוּתוֹ סָפֵק עַד שֶׁלֹּא תִיכָּנֵס לִרְשׁוּתוֹ הַבַּעַל צָרִיךְ לְהָבִיא רְאָיָיה. מִן אִילֵּין בְּתוּלִין. וּבְתוּלִין וְכִי בָטְלוּ לֹא בְּבֵית אָבִיהָ בָטְלוּ. וְאַתְּ אָמַר. הַבַּעַל צָרִיךְ לְהָבִיא רְאָיָיה. וָכָא הַבַּעַל צָרִיךְ לְהָבִיא רְאָיָיה.

There, we have stated: “If she had bodily defects while still in her father’s house, the father has to bring proof.” Rebbi Eleazar asked Rebbi Joḥanan: Is this Mishnah from Rabban Gamliel and Rebbi Eliezer? Not from Rebbi Joshua? He said to him, those are everybody’s words. There is a difference because bodily defects have a way to appear. Rebbi Yose said, formerly we saw rabbis who compared bodily defects to [defects of] virginity. These can be inferred from those and those can be inferred from these. Bodily defects from claims of missing virginity: For if he slept with her in her father’s house, the father has to provide proof. Claims of missing virginity from bodily defects: For if she developed bodily defects and there is a doubt whether it happened after she entered his domain or before she entered his domain, the husband has to provide proof, from claims of missing virginity. But if she lost her virginity, was it not in her father’s house? Nevertheless, you say, the husband has to provide proof; so here also, the husband has to provide proof.