Jerusalem Talmud Ketubot 4.6

משנה: הָאָב זַכַּאי בְּבִתּוֹ בְּקִידּוּשֶׁיהָ בַּכֶּסֶף בַּשְּׁטָר וּבַבִּיאָה וְזַכַּאי בִּמְצִיאָתָהּ וּבְמַעֲשֵׂה יָדֶיהָ וּבְהֵפֵר נְדָרֶיהָ וּמְקַבֵּל אֶת גִיטָּהּ וְאֵינוֹ אוֹכֵל פֵּירוֹת בְּחַיֶּיהָ. נִיסֵּית יָתֵר עָלָיו הַבַּעַל שֶׁאוֹכֵל פֵּירוֹת בְּחַיֶּיהָ וְחַיָיב בִּמְזוֹנוֹתֵיהָ בְּפִרְקוֹנָהּ וּבִקְבוּרָתָהּ. רִבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר אֲפִילוּ עָנִי שֶׁבְּיִשְׂרָאֵל לֹא יִפְחוֹת לָהּ מִשְּׁנֵי חֲלִילִין וּמְקוֹנֶנֶת.

MISHNAH: The father has the benefit to give his daughter in preliminary marriage by money, contract, or intercourse; he has the right to what she finds and to her earnings, to dissolve her vows, and to receive her bill of divorce, but cannot eat usufruct in her lifetime. If she is definitively married, the husband in addition eats usufruct in her lifetime but is required to pay for her upkeep, her ransom, and her burial. Rebbi Jehudah says, even the poorest in Israel should not provide for her less than two flutes and one wailing woman.

הלכה: הָאָב זַכַּאי בְּבִתּוֹ כול׳. נִיחָא בַּכֶּסֶף וּבַשְׁטָר הָאָב זַכַּאי. בַּבִּיאָה. תִּיפְתָּר שֶׁאָמַר לוֹ. לִכְשֶׁתִּקָּנֶה לִי בִּיתָּךְ בַּבִּיאָה יִהְיֶה לָךְ כֶּסֶף זֶה.

HALAKHAH: “The father has the benefit to give his daughter,” etc. One understands that the father has a benefit from money or contract. By intercourse? Explain it that [the groom] said to [the father]: When your daughter becomes mine by intercourse, this money shall be your property.

זַכַּאי בִּמְצִיאָתָהּ. רִבִּי זַכַּאי דְּאַלֶכְסַנְדְּרִיאָה מִישְׁאַל שְׁאַל. מְצִיאָה שֶׁנָּפְלָה לוֹ מַחְמַת שָׂדֶה מָה אַתְּ עְבַד לָהּ בִּמְצִיאָה אוֹ בְּאוֹכֶלֶת פֵּירוֹת שֶׁלָּהּ. אִין תַּעַבְדִינָהּ בְּאוֹכֶלֶת פֵּירוֹת שֶׁלָּהּ.

“He has the right to what she finds.” Rebbi Zakkai from Alexandria asked: How do you treat what she found on [her] field, as a find or as her usufruct? If you treat it as usufruct it is hers..

נִישֵּׂאת יוֹתֵר עָלָיו הַבַּעַל שֶׁאוֹכֵל פֵּירוֹת בְּחַיֶּיהָ. תְּקָנָה תִיקְּנוּ שֶׁיְּהֵא מְפַקֵּחַ עַל נִיכְסֵי אִשְׁתּוֹ וְאוֹכֵל. וָאוֹמֵר. אַף בְאָב כֵּן. בְּלֹא כָךְ הָאָב מְפַקֵּחַ עַל נִיכְסֵי בִתּוֹ וְאוֹכֵל. חַיָיב בִּמְזוֹנוֹתֵיהָ וּבְפִרְקוֹנָהּ. תַּנֵּי. הַבַּעַל שֶׁאָמַר. אֵי אֶיפְשִׁי לֹא לוֹכַל וְלֹא לְפַקֵּחַ. אֵין שׁוֹמְעִין לוֹ. הָאָב שֶׁאָמַר. אֲנִי אוֹכֵל וּמְפַקֵּחַ. שׁוֹמְעִין לוֹ.

“If she is definitively married, the husband in addition eats usufruct in her lifetime,” as a regulation they instituted that he should oversee his wife’s property and eat from it. Is it also thus for the father? Without incentives the father overseas the daughter’s property; should he eat? “He is required to pay for her upkeep and her ransom.” It was stated: If the husband said, it is impossible for me to eat and to oversee, one does not listen to him; but if the father said, I shall oversee if I can eat, one listens to him.

וּבִקְבוּרָתָהּ. תַּנֵּי. לֹא רָצָה הַבַּעַל לְקוֹבְרָהּ הָאָב קוֹבְרָהּ וּמוֹצִיא מִמֶּנּוּ בַדִּין. אָמַר רִבִּי חַגַּיי. לֹא אָמְרוּ אֶלָּא הָאָב. הָא אַחֵר אֵינוֹ גוֹבֶה. רִבִּי יוֹסֵי אוֹמֵר. בֵּין אָב וּבֵין אַחֵר גּוֹבֶה. וַתְיָיאן אִילֵּין פְּלוּגָתָא. דְּתַנִּינָן תַּמָּן. וְחַיָיב בִּמְזוֹנוֹתֵיהָ וּבְפִרְקוֹנָהּ וּבִקְבוּרָתָהּ. אָמַר רִבִּי חַגַּיי. לֹא אָמְרוּ אֶלָּא אַחֵר הָא הָאָב גּוֹבֶה. רִבִּי יוֹסֵי אוֹמֵר. בֵּין אָב בֵּין אַחֵר אֵינוֹ גוֹבֶה. עַל דַּעְתֵּיהּ דְּרִבִּי חַגַּי בֵּין לִקְבוּרָה בֵין לִמְזוֹנֵי הָאָב גּוֹבֶה אַחֵר אֵינוֹ גוֹבֶה. עַל דַּעְתֵּיהּ דְּרִבִּי יוֹסֵי. לִקְבוּרָה בֵּין אָב בֵּין אַחֵר גּוֹבֶה. שֶׁלֹּא עָלַת עַל דַּעַת שֶׁתְּהֵא אִשְׁתּוֹ מוּשְׁלֶכֶת לַכְּלָבִים. תַּנֵי. כָּל מָקוֹם שֶׁנָּהֲגוּ לְהַסְפִּיד מַסְפִּידִין.

“And her burial.” It was stated: If the husband refused to bury her, the father buries her and recovers his expenses in court. Rebbi Ḥaggai said, they said only, the father. Therefore, a third party cannot recover. Rebbi Yose says, both the father and also a third party can recover. There is a parallel disagreement, as we have stated there: “He is required to pay for her upkeep, her ransom, and her burial.” Rebbi Ḥaggai said, they said only, a third party. Therefore, the father can recover. Rebbi Yose says, neither the father nor a third party can recover. In the opinion of Rebbi Ḥaggai, both for burial and for upkeep the father can recover, a third party cannot recover. In the opinion of Rebbi Yose, for burial both the father and also a third party can recover because it is unthinkable that his wife should be thrown to the dogs. It was stated: At a place where it is customary to eulogize, one eulogizes.