Jerusalem Talmud Pesachim 1.5

משנה: וְעוֹד אָמַר רִבִּי יְהוּדָה שְׁתֵּי חַלּוֹת שֶׁל תּוֹדָה פְּסוּלוֹת וּמוּנָּחוֹת עַל גַּג הָאִיצְטֳבָא. כָּל זְמַן שֶׁהֶן מוּנָּחוֹת כָּל הָעָם אוֹכְלִין. נִיטְלָה אַחַת תּוֹלִין לֹא אוֹכְלִין וְלֹא שׂוֹרְפִין. נִיטְלוּ שְׁתֵּיהֶן הִתְחִילוּ כָּל הָעָם שׂוֹרְפִין. רַבָּן גַּמְלִיאֵל אוֹמֵר חוּלִין נֶאֱכָלִין כָּל אַרְבַּע וּתְרוּמָה כָּל חָמֵשׁ וְשׂוֹרְפִין בִּתְחִילַּת שֵׁשׁ:

MISHNAH: In addition, Rebbi Jehudah said, two disqualified loaves of thanksgiving offering were lying on the roof of the stoa. As long as they were lying there, everybody was eating. If one was removed one suspends, neither does one eat nor burn. If both were removed, everybody started to burn. Rabban Gamliel says, profane food is eaten the entire fourth [hour] and heave the entire fifth; and one burns at the start of the sixth.

הלכה: רִבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן לָקִישׁ אָמַר בְּשֵׁם רִבִּי יַנַּאי. כְּשֵׁירוֹת הָיוּ. מִשֵּׁם מַאי הוּא פוֹסְלָן. שֶׁלֹּא לִשְׁחוֹט עֲלֵיהֶן אֶת הַזֶּבַח. וְלֹא בִשְׁחִיטָה הֵן קְדֵישׁוֹת. וְיִפָּדֶה וְיֵאָכֵל. אָמַר רִבִּי חֲנַנְיָה. חוֹלִיָיא קוֹמוֹי לֹא אָכַל. וְאַתְּ אָמַרְתָּ. יִפָּדֶה וְיֵאָכֵל. רִבִּי [חֲנִינָא] אָמַר. פְּסוּלוֹת הָיוּ. מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהֵן מְמַהֲרִין לְהָבִיא תוֹדוֹתֵיהֶן מִפּנֵי חָמֵץ שֶׁבַּתוֹדָה. וְאֵי אֶיפְשַׁר שֶׁלֹּא יִישָּׁפֵךְ דָּמָהּ שֶׁלְאֶחָד מֵהֶן וְהִיא נִפְסֶלֶת.

HALAKHAH: Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish said in the name of Rebbi Yannai: They were qualified. And why does he treat them as disqualified? Not to slaughter the sacrifice for them. But do they not become sancta only by the slaughter? They should be redeemed and be eaten! Rebbi Ḥanania said, he has profane [bread] before him which he could not eat and you are saying, they should be redeemed and be eaten? Rebbi [Ḥanina] said, they were disqualified. Since they are in a hurry to bring their thanksgiving sacrifices because of the leavened bread with the sacrifice, it is impossible that not the blood of one of them be spilled and it becomes disqualified.

תַּנֵּי. שְׁתֵּי פָּרוֹת חוֹרְשׁוֹת [בִּירוּשָׁלִַם.] וִירושָׁלִַם לֹא בְמָקוֹם שֶׁנָּהֲגוּ שֶׁלֹּא לַעֲשׂוֹת מָלָאכָה בְּאַרְבָּעָה עָשָׁר הִיא. נִרָאֵית כְּחוֹרְשׁוֹת. אִית תַּנָּיֵי תַנֵּי. שְׁתֵּי נֵירוֹת דּוֹלְקִין. אִית תַּנָּיֵי תַנֵּי. שְׁנֵי סַדִּינִין. אָמַר רִבִּי פִינְחָס. וְלֹא פְלִיגִין. מָאן דְּאָמַר. שְׁתֵּי פָּרוֹת שְׁתֵּי נֵירוֹת. בַּחוֹל. מָאן דָּמַר. שְׁנֵי סַדִּינִין. בַּשַּׁבָּת.

It was stated: Two cows were ploughing [in Jerusalem]. But is Jerusalem not a place where they used not to work on the Fourteenth? They were looking as if ploughing. There are Tannaim who stated: Two lights were burning. There are Tannaim who stated: Two sheets. Rebbi Phineas said, they do not disagree. He who said, two cows, two lights, on a weekday. He who said, two sheets, on the Sabbath.

רִבִּי חֲנַנְיָה בְעָא קוֹמֵי רִבִּי מָנָא. וְיִקְבְּעוּ לָהּ תְּקִיעָה. אָמַר לֵיהּ. אִם אוֹמֵר אַתְּ כֵּן נִמְצֵאתָה [אוֹמֵר. שֶׁמָּא] לְתָמִיד הֵן תוֹקְעִין [וְהֵן מִתְקַלְקְלִין]. אָמַר לֵיהּ. וְהָא תַנִּינָן. שָׁלשׁ לְהַבְטִיל אֶת הָעָם מִן הַמְּלָאכָה. וְשָׁלשׁ לְהַבְדִּיל בֵּין קוֹדֶשׁ לְחוֹל. אָמַר לֵיהּ. תַּמָּן כָּל עֶרֶב שַׁבָּת וְשַׁבָּת הֵן תוֹקְעִין וְאֵינָּן טוֹעִין. בְּרַם הָכָא אַחַת לְקִיצִּין הֵן. אִם אוֹמֵר אַתְּ כֵּן. אַף הֵן סְבוּרִין שֶׁמָּא לְתָמִיד הֵן תוֹקְעִין וְהֵן מִתְקַלְקְלִין.

Rebbi Ḥananiah asked before Rebbi Mana, should they not insitute trumpet blowing? If you say so, it would turn out that [they would say, maybe] they blow for the daily sacrifice[, and they would be led astray]. He retorted, but did we not state: “Three to separate people from work, and three to separate between weekday and holiness”? He answered him, there every single Friday they are blowing, one will not err. But here it is once in a long time; if you say so, it would turn out that they would say, maybe they blow for the daily sacrifice, and they would be led astray.

לָמַּה. מִפְּנֵי קְדושָּׁתָהּ. אוֹ מִשׁוּם שֶׁאֵין אוֹכְלֶיהָ מְצוּיִין. מַה נְפִיק מִבֵּינֵיהוֹן. חַלּוֹת תּוֹדָה. אִין תֵּימַר שֶׁאֵין אוֹכְלֶיהָ מְצוּיִין. אֵילּוּ אוֹכְלֶיהֶן מְצוּיִין. אִין תֵּימַר מִפְּנֵי קְדושָּׁתָהּ. אֵילּוּ יֵשׁ לָהֶן קְדוּשָּׁה. רִבִּי נָתָן אוֹמֵר. כְּשֵׁירוֹת נִיטְלוּ (שֶׁיְּהוּ) [שׁוֹהִין] לָהֶן שָׁעָה אַחַת לַאֲכִילָתָן וְתוֹלִין אֲבָל לֹא שׂוֹרְפִין. אִית לָךְ מֵימַר מִשׁוּם שֶׁאֵין אוֹכְלֶיהָ מְצוּיִין. לֹא מִפְּנֵי קְדושָּׁתָהּ. אוֹף הָכָא מִפְּנֵי קְדושָּׁתָהּ.

Why? Because of its holiness or because its eaters are few? What is the difference between them? The breads of the thanksgiving sacrifice. If you are saying because its eaters are few, the eaters of these are many. If you are saying because of its holiness, these are holy. Rebbi Nathan says, they were taken when qualified, (that there be) [one waits] one hour when they can be eaten, one suspends but does not burn. Could you say because its eaters are few? No, because of its holiness; here also because of its holiness.

אָמַר רִבִּי יוּדָה בֵּן פָּזִי. נִרָאִין דְּבָרִים שֶׁתְּהֵא הֲלָכָה כְרַבָּן גַּמְלִיאֵל. שֶׁהוּא אוֹמֵר מֵעֵין שְׁנֵיהֶן. אֲתֲאַ רִבִּי אָבוּן רִבִּי יוֹחָנָן בְּשֵׁם רִבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן יוֹצָדָק. הֲלָכָה כְרַבָּן גַּמְלִיאֵל. שֶׁהוּא אוֹמֵר מֵעֵין שְׁנֵיהֶן.

Rebbi Jehudah ben Pazi said, it seems that practice has to follow Rabban Gamliel since he says it similar to both of them There came Rebbi Abun, Rebbi Joḥanan in the name of Rebbi Simeon ben Josadaq: practice follows Rabban Gamliel since what he says is similar to both of them.