Jerusalem Talmud Bava Kamma 8.3

משנה: שֶׁבֶת. רוֹאִין אוֹתוֹ כְּאִילּוּ הוּא שׁוֹמֵר קִישּׁוּאִין שֶׁכְּבָר נָתַן לוֹ דְמֵי יָדוֹ וּדְמֵי רַגְלוֹ. בּוֹשֶׁת. הַכֹּל לְפִי הַמְבַיֵישׁ וְהַמִּתְבַּיֵישׁ. הַמְבַיֵישׁ אֶת הֶעָרוֹם הַמְבַיֵישׁ אֶת הַסּוֹמֶא וְהַמְבַיֵישׁ אֶת הַיָּשֵׁן חַיָיב וְיָשֵׁן שֶׁבִּיֵישׁ פָּטוּר. נָפַל מִן הַגַּג וְהִזִּיק וּבִיֵישׁ חַיָיב עַל הַנֶּזֶק וּפָטוּר עַל הַבּוֹשֶׁת שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר וְשָׁלְחָה יָדָהּ וְהֶחֱזִיקָה בִּמְבוּשָׁיו אֵינוֹ חַיָיב עַל הַבּוֹשֶׁת עַד שֶׁיְּהֵא מִתְכַּוֵין.

MISHNAH: Loss of earnings. One considers him as if he were a watchman of pumpkins since he already compensated him for the loss of his hand or loss of his foot. Embarrassment. Everything depends on the person embarrassing and the one embarrassed. One who embarrassed a naked person, or embarrassed a blind person, or embarrassed a sleeping person is liable, but the sleeper who embarrassed is not liable. If a person fell from a roof and caused damage and embarrassed, he is liable for the damage but not liable for the embarrassment since is was said: “She reached out with her hand and grabbed him at his private parts;” one is not liable for embarrassment unless if was intended.

הלכה: שֶׁבֶת. רוֹאִין אוֹתוֹ כול׳. הָכָא אַתָּ מַר. רוֹאִין אוֹתוֹ כִּילּוּ שׁוֹמֵר קִישּׁוּאִין. וְהָכָא אַתָּ מַר. הָיָה עוֹשֶׂה מְנָה בַיּוֹם נוֹתֵן לוֹ מְנָה. סֶלַע נוֹתֵן לוֹ סֶלַע. אָמַר רִבִּי יִצְחָק. תְּרֵין שִׁבְתִּין אִינּוּן. הִכָּהוּ עַל יָדוֹ וּקְטָעָהּ אֵין רוֹאִין אוֹתוֹ כִּילּוּ עוֹשֶׂה מְנָה בַיּוֹם אֶלָּא רוֹאִין אוֹתוֹ כִּילּוּ חִיגֵּר יוֹשֵׁב וְשׁוֹמֵֵר קִישּׁוּאִין. שֶׁכְּבָר נָתַן לוֹ דְמֵי יָדוֹ וּדְמֵי רַגְלוֹ. שֶׁאִם כְּוִייוֹ עַל כַּף יָדוֹ וְצָבַת עַל כַּף רֹאשׁוֹ וְצָבָה. אוֹ שֶׁהִטִּיל עָלָיו שֶׁלֶג אוֹ צוֹנָן בְּמָקוֹם שֶׁאֵינוֹ נִרְאֶה. חַיָיב לְרַפּוֹתוֹ.

HALAKHAH: “Loss of earnings. One considers him,” etc. Here you say, “one considers him as if he were a watchman of pumpkins.” But there, you say, “if he was earning a mina per day, he pays him a mina; a tetradrachma, he gives him a tetradrachma.” Rebbi Isaac said, there are two kinds of inability to work. If he hit him on his hand and cut it off, one does not consider him as if he earned a mina a day but one considers him as if he were a lame person watching pumpkins, because he already compensated him for the loss of his hand or loss of his foot. But if he burned him on the palm of his hand and it swelled, on the flat of his head and it swelled, or he put on him snow or cold water at a place which is not visible, then he has to pay his medical expenses.

תַּנֵּי. וְשָׁלְחָה יָדָהּ. וְלֹא אֵשֶׁת שְׁלִיחַ בֵּית דִּין. תַּנַּיֵי חוֹרָן תַנֵּי. וְשָׁלְחָה יָדָהּ. לְרַבּוֹת אֵשֶׁת שְׁלִיחַ בֵּית דִּין. מָאן דָּמַר. וְשָׁלְחָה יָדָהּ. וְלֹא אֵשֶׁת שְׁלִיחַ בֵּית דִּין. בְּשֶׁהִכָּהוּ בִּרְשׁוּת. מָאן דָּמַר. לְרַבּוֹת אֵשֶׁת שְׁלִיחַ בֵּית דִּין. בְּשֶׁהִכָּהוּ שֶׁלֹּא בִרְשׁוּת. תַּנֵּי. לֹא אֵשֶׁת שְׁנַיִם.

It was stated: “She reached out with her hand,” but not the court marshal’s wife. Another Tanna stated, “she reached out with her hand,” including the court marshal’s wife. He who said, “she reached out with her hand,” but not the court marshal’s wife, if he whipped with permission. He who said, “she reached out with her hand,” including the court marshal’s wife, if he whipped without permission. It was stated: Not the wife of two men.