Jerusalem Talmud Pesachim 7.9

משנה: הַפֶּסַח שֶׁיָּצָא אוֹ שֶׁנִּטְמָא יִשָּרֵף מִיָּד. נִיטְמְאוּ הַבְּעָלִים אוֹ שֶׁמֵּתוּ תְּעוּבַּר צוּרָתוֹ וְיֵצֵא לְבֵית הַשְּׂרֵיפָה. רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן בֶּן בְּרוֹקָה אוֹמֵר אַף זֶה יִשָּרֵף מִיָּד שֶׁאֵין לוֹ אוֹכְלִין:

MISHNAH: Pesaḥ which left or which became impure has to be burned immediately. If the owners became impure or died it shall lose its shape and be brought to the place of burning. Rebbi Joḥanan ben Beroqa says, this one also has to be burned immediately since it has no eaters.

הלכה: תַּנֵּי רִבִּי חִיָיה. פְּסוּל גּוּף [פִּגּוּל הוּא וְ]נִשְׂרַף מִיָּד. [נִטְמְאוּ בְעָלִים אוֹ שֶׁמֵּתוּ] פְּסוּל מַכְשִׁיר טָעוּן צוּרָה. אָמַר רִבִּי יוֹסֵה. מַתְנִיתָא אָמְרָה כֵן. פֶּסַח שֶׁיָּצָא אוֹ שֶׁנִּיטְמָא. פְּסוּל גּוּף הוּא וְנשְּרַף מִיָּד. נִיטְמְאוּ הַבְּעָלִים אֹו שֶׁמֵּתוּ. פְּסוּל מַכְשִׁיר הוּא וְטָעוּן צוּרָה.

HALAKHAH: Rebbi Ḥiyya stated: “A disqualification of the body [is piggul and] is immediately burned. [If the owners became impure or died it is] a disqualification of enabler and needs to lose its shape. Rebbi Yose said, the Mishnah says so: “Pesaḥ which left or which became impure is a disqualification of the body and has to be burned immediately. If the owner became impure or died it is a disqualification of the enabler and it shall lose its shape.”

רִבִּי חָמָא בַּר עוּקְבָּה בְשֵׁם רִבִּי יוֹסֵה בַּר חֲנִינָה. רִבִּי נְחֶמְיָה וְרִבִּי יוֹחָנָן בֶּן בְּרוֹקָה שְׁנֵיהֶם אָמְרוּ דָבָר אֶחָד. דְּתַנֵּי. אָמַר רִבִּי נְחֶמְיָה. וְכִי מִפְּנֵי אֲנִינָה נִשְׂרַף. וְהָא לֹא נִשְׂרַף אֶלָּא מִפְּנֵי הַטּוּמְאָה. שֶׁאִילּוּ מִפְּנֵי אֲנִינָה נִשְׂרַף הָיָה לִשְׁלָשׁתָּן לִישָּׂרֵף. דָּבָר אַחֵר. וַהֲלֹא פִינְחָס הָיָה עִמָּהֶן. דָּבָר אַחֵר. וַהֲלֹא מוּתָּר לְאוֹכְלוֹ מִבָּעֶרֶב. עַל דַּעְתֵּיהּ דְּרִבִּי נְחֶמְיָה יִשְׂרוֹף וְיִמְנֶה. סָבַר רִבִּי נְחֶמְיָה. שְׁלָשׁתָּן נִשְׂרְפוּ. הָיָה לוֹ לְפִינְחָס לוֹכַל. וְאַדַּיִין לֹא נִתְמַנֶּה כֹהֵן גָּדוֹל. וְהָיָה לוֹ לְאַהֲרֹן לוֹכַל מִבָּעֶרֶב. סָבַר רִבִּי נְחֶמְיָה. אֲנִינָה [לָיְלָה] תוֹרָה. אָמַר רִבִּי יִרְמְיָה. אוֹף רִבִּי יוֹסֵי הַגָּלִילִי דִּכְוָותְהוֹן. דְּתַנִּינָן תַּמָּן. חַטָּאת שֶׁקִּיבֵּל דָּמָהּ בִּשְׁנֵי כוֹסוֹת. יָצָא אֶחָד מֵהֶן לַחוּץ. הַפְּנִימִי כָשֵׁר. נִכְנַס אֶחָד מֵהֶן לִפְנִים. רִבִּי יוֹסֵי הַגָּלִילִי מַכְשִׁיר בַּחִיצוֹן. וַחֲכָמִים פּוֹסְלִין. [אָמַר רִבִּי יוֹסֵי הַגָּלִילִי. וּמָה אִם בִּמְקוֹם שֶׁמַּחֲשָׁבָה פוֹסֶלֶת בַחוּץ. לֹא עָשָׂה בָהּ הַמְשׁוֹאָר כַּיוֹצֵא. מְקוֹם שֶׁאֵין הַמַּחֲשָׁבָה פוֹסֶלֶת בִּפְנִים אֵינוֹ דִין שֶׁלֹּא נַעֲשֶׂה הַמְשׁוֹאָר כַּנִּכְנָס. נִכְנַס לְכַפֵּר. אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁלֹּא כִפֵּר. פָּסוּל. דִּבְרֵי רִבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר. רִבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן אוֹמֵר. עַד שֶׁיְּכַפֵּר. רִבִּי יוּדָא אוֹמֵר. אִם הִכְנִיס שׁוֹגֵג. כָּשֵׁר. כָּל הַדָּמִים פְּסוּלִין שֶׁנִּתְּנוּ עַל גַּבֵּי הַמִּזְבֵּחַ לֹא הוּרְצָה הַצִּיץ אֶלָּא עַל טָמֵא. שֶׁהַצִּיץ מְרַצֶּה עַל טָמֵא וְאֵינוֹ מְרַצֶּה עַל הַיּוֹצֵא] אָמַר רִבִּי לָעְזָר. תֵּדַע לָךְ שֶׁהוּא פְסוּל מַכְשִׁיר כְּרִבִּי יוֹסֵי הַגָּלִילִי. שֶׁהֲרֵי חֲבֵירוֹ מִבַּחוּץ והוּא כָשֵׁר. תֵּדַע לָךְ שֶׁהוּא פְסוּל גּוּף כְּרַבָּנִן. שֶׁהֲרֵי הוּא בִמְחִיצָתוֹ וְהוּא פָסוּל. רַבָּנִן דָּרְשִׁין. מִפְּנֵי שֵׁלֹּא נִכְנַס דָּמָהּ מִקְצַת לִפְנִים אָכוֹל תֹּאכְלוּ אֹתָהּ. הָא אִם נִכְנַס מִקְצַת דָּמָהּ לִפְנִים [יָפֶה עֲשִׂיתֶם] שֶׁשְּׂרַפְתֶּם. רִבִּי יוֹסֵי הַגָּלִילִי דָּרַשׁ. מִפְּנֵי שֵׁלֹּא נִכְנַס כָּל דָּמָהּ לִפְנִים [אָכוֹל תֹּאכְלוּ אֹתָהּ. הָא אִם נִכְנַס כָּל דָּמָהּ לִפְנִים] יָפֶה עֲשִׂיתֶם שֶׁשְּׂרַפְתֶּם. מַה טַעֲמוֹן דְּרַבָּנִן. וְכָל חַטָּאת אֲשֶׁר יוּבָא מִדָּמָהּ. אֲפִילוּ מִקְצַת דָּמָהּ. מַה טַעֲמֵיהּ דְּרִבִּי יוֹסֵה הַגָּלִילִי. הֵן לֹא הוּבָא אֶת דָּמָהּ אֶל הַקּוֹדֶשׁ פְּנִימָה. [כְּהָדָא דְ]תַנֵּי. רִבִּי יוֹסֵי הַגָּלִילִי אוֹמֵר. אֵין כָּל הָעִנְיָין הַזֶּה מְדַבֵּר אֶלָּא בַפָּרִים הַנִּשְׂרָפִין וּבַשְּׂעִירִין הַנִּשְׂרָפִין לִיתֵּן עֲלֵיהֶן לֹא תַעֲשֶׂה עַל אֲכִילָתָן וּלְלַמֵּד שֶׁפְּסוּלֵיהֶן נִשְׂרָפִין בְּבֵית הַבִּירָה. אָמְרוּ לוֹ. מְנַיִין לַחַטֹּאת שֶׁאִם נִכְנַס מִדָּמָהּ לִפְנִים תְּהֵא פְסוּלָה. לֹא מִן הָדֵין קִרְיָיא הֵן לֹא הוּבָא אֶת דָּמָהּ אֶל הַקּוֹדֶשׁ פְּנִימָה. הָא אֵינוֹ אוֹמֵר מִדָּמָהּ אֶלְּא כָל דָּמָהּ. תְּשׁוּבָה לְרִבִּי עֲקִיבָה שֶׁהָיָה אוֹמֵר. מִדָּמָהּ. לֹא כָל דָּמָהּ.

Rebbi Ḥama bar Uqba in the name of Rebbi Yose bar Ḥanina: Rebbi Nehemiah and Rebbi Joḥanan ben Beroqa both said the same, as it was stated: “it was burned because of deep mourning? Was it not burned only because of impurity? But it was not burned because of impurity, since if it had been burned because of mourning, all three of them should have been burned. Another opinion, was not Phineas with them? Another opinion, would it not have been permitted to be eaten in the evening?” In the opinion of Rebbi Nehemiah it should be burned but be counted. Rebbi Nehemiah is of the opinion that all three of them were burned. Should not Phineas have eaten? He was not yet appointed {High} Priest. Should not Aaron have eaten in the evening? Rebbi Nehemiah is of the opinion that deeo mourning in the night is from the Torah. Rebbi Jeremiah said, also Rebbi Yose the Galilean is with them. And we have stated there: “A purification sacrifice whose blood was received in two cups, of which one was brought outside; the one inside is qualified. If one of them was brought to the interior, Rebbi Yose the Galilean declares qualified but the Sages declare disqualified. [Rebbi Yose the Galilean said, since in a case where intent disqualifies outside the remainder was not made equal to what was brought outside, in a case where intent does not disqualify in the interior is it not logical that we not make the remainder to what was brought inside? If it was brought into the interior to atone, even if it did not atone it is disqualified, the words of Rebbi Eliezer. Rebbi Simeon says, only if it atones. Rebbi Jehudah says, if it was brought into the interior in error, it remains qualified. Of all disqualified blood which one gave on the altar, the diadem only makes the impure acceptable; for the diadem makes the impure acceptable but not what was brought outside.”] Rebbi Eleazar said, you have to know that for Rebbi Yose the Galilean it is disqualification of the enabler since the other part is outside and it is qualified. You have to know that for the rabbis it is disqualification of the body since it is within its enclosure and it is disqualified. The rabbis explain, since nothing of the blood was brought to the interior, you shall certainly eat it. Therefore if some of the blood had been brought to the interior, you [would have done well] in burning it. Rebbi Yose the Galilean explains, since not all of the blood was brought to the interior, [you shall certainly eat it. Therefore if all of the blood had been brought inside,] you would have done well in burning it. What is the rabbis’ reason? Any purification offering of whose blood was brought; even part of the blood. What is Rebbi Yose the Galilean’s reason? Behold, its blood was not brought inside the Sanctuary. [This fits with] what was stated: Rebbi Yose the Galilean says, the entire matter only speaks of bulls to be burned and goats to be burned, to prohibit eating them and to teach that if they are disqualified they are burned inside the citadel. They asked him, from where that a purification sacrifice becomes disqualified if some of its blood is brought inside? Not from this verse, behold, its blood was not brought inside the Sanctuary? There it does not say of whose blood but all of its blood. An answer to Rebbi Aqiba who was saying, of whose blood, not all of its blood.