Jerusalem Talmud Avodah Zarah 5.12

משנה: אֵילּוּ אֲסוּרִין וְאוֹסְרִין כָּל שֶׁהֵן. יֵין נֶסֶךְ וַעֲבוֹדָה זָרָה וְעוֹרוֹת לְבוּבִין וְשׁוֹר הַנִּסְקָל וְעֶגְלָה עֲרוּפָה וְצִיפֳּרֵי מְצוֹרָע וְשֵׂיעָר נָזִיר וּפֶטֶר חֲמוֹר וּבָשָׂר בֶּחָלָב וְחוּלִּין שֶׁנִּשְׁחֲטוּ בָּעֲזָרָה. הֲרֵי אֵילּוּ אֲסוּרִין וְאוֹסְרִין בְּכָל שֶׁהֵן:

MISHNAH: The following are forbidden and they forbid in the most minute amount: Libation wine, idols, heart-removed skins, and an ox which was stoned, and the calf whose neck was broken, and the birds of the sufferer from skin disease, and the nazir’s hair, and the firstborn donkey, and meat in milk, and profane animals slaughtered in the Temple precinct. These are forbidden and they forbid in the most minute amount.

הלכה: אֵילּוּ אֲסוּרִין וְאוֹסְרִין כָּל שֶׁהֵן כול׳. יֵין נֶסֶךְ וַעֲבוֹדָה זָרָה וְעוֹרוֹת לְבוּבִין על שֵׁם וְלֹא יִדְבַּק בְּיָדְךָ מְאוּמָה מִן הַחֵרֶם.

HALAKHAH: “The following are forbidden and they forbid in the most minute amount,” etc. Libation wine, idols, heart-removed skins, because nothing of the taboo should cling to your hand.

וְשׁוֹר הַנִּסְקָל. מִמַּשְׁמַע שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר יִסָּקֵל הַשּׁוֹר אֵינִי יוֹדֵעַ שֶׁלֹּא יֵאָכֵל. מַה תַלְמוּד לוֹמַר לֹא יֵאָכֵל. מִיכָּן שֶׁאָסוּר אַף בַּהֲנָיָיה.

An ox which was stoned. From the meaning of what was said, the ox shall be stoned would I not know that it cannot be eaten? Why does the verse say, it shall not be eaten? From here that it is forbidden for usufruct.

עֶגְלָה עֲרוּפָה. שָׁם שָׁם. מַה שָׁם הָאָמוּר לְהַלָּן אָסוּר בַּהֲנָיָיה אַף שָׁם הָאָמוּר כָּאן אָסוּר בַּהֲנָיָיה.

And the calf whose neck was broken. There, there. Since there mentioned further describes a prohibition of usufruct, also there said here implies prohibition of usufruct.

וְצִיפֳּרֵי מְצוֹרָע. כָּל צִפּוֹר טְהוֹרָה תֹּאכֵלוּ זוֹ הַחַיָּה. וְזֶה אֲשֶׁר לֹא תֹאכְלוּ מֵהֶם זֶה הַשְּׁחוּטָה. אוֹ חִילּוּף. רִבִּי יוֹחָנָן בְּשֵׁם רִבִּי יִשְׁמָעֵאל. לֹא הִתְפִּישָׂה הַתּוֹרָה אִיסּוּר הֲנָיָיה דָּבָר שֶׁיֶּשׁ בּוֹ רוּחַ חַיִּים.

And the birds of the sufferer from skin disease. Any pure bird you may eat, this is the living bird. But the following you may not eat of them, that is the slaughtered one. Or the other way around? Rebbi Joḥanan in the name of Rebbi Ismael: The Torah has no prohibition of usufruct which applies to any living thing.

וְשֵׂיעָר נָזִיר. וְנָתַן עַל הָאֵשׁ אֲשֶׁר תַּחַת זֶבַח הַשְּׁלָמִים.

And the nazir’s hair. He shall put it in the fire which is under the well-being offering.

וּפֶטֶר חֲמוֹר. עֲרִיפָה עֲרִיפָה. מַה לְהַלָּן קוֹבְרוֹ וְאָסוּר בַּהֲנָיָיה אַף כָּאן קוֹבְרוֹ וְאָסוּר בַּהֲנָיָיה.

And the firstborn donkey. Breaking the neck, breaking the neck. Since there one buries it and it is forbidden for usufruct, also here one buries it and it is forbidden for usufruct.

וּבָשָׂר בֶּחָלָב. תַּנֵּי. בִּשְׁלֹשָׁה מְקוֹמוֹת כָּתוּב לֹא תְבַשֵּׁל גְּדִי. לַאֲכִילָה וְלַהֲנָיָיה וּלְבִישּׁוּל.

And meat in milk. It was stated: At three places it is written do not cook a kid goat, about eating, about usufruct, and about cooking.

וְחוּלִּין שֶׁנִּשְׁחֲטוּ בָּעֲזָרָה. רִבִּי יוֹחָנָן בְּשֵׁם רִבִּי יִשְׁמָעֵאל. אָמְרָה תוֹרָה. שְׁחוֹט שֶׁלִּי בְשֶׁלִּי וְשֶׁלָּךְ בְּשֶׁלָּךְ. מַה שֶׁלִּי בְשֶׁלָּךְ אָסוּר. אַף שֶׁלָּךְ בְּשֶׁלִּי עָנוּשׁ כָּרֵת. וְלָאו רִבִּי יִשְׁמָעֵאל אָמַר. לְמֵידִין מִקַּל וָחוֹמֶר וְאֵין עוֹנְשִׁין מִקַּל וָחוֹמֶר.

And profane animals slaughtered in the Temple precinct. Rebbi Joḥanan in the name of Rebbi Ismael: The Torah said, slaughter what is Mine in My place and what is yours in yours. Since Mine in yours is forbidden, also yours in Mine. Is it punished by extirpation? Does not Rebbi Ismael say, one infers by an argument de minore ad majus but one does not punish by an argument de minore ad majus?

וְלָמָּה לֹא תַנִּינָן נְבֵילָה עִמָּהֶן. אָמַר רִבִּי יוֹסֵי בֵּירִבִּי בּוּן. לֹא מַתְנֵי אֶלָּא דָּבָר שֶׁאָסוּר בַּהַנָיָיה. נְבֵילָה מוּתֶּרֶת בַּהֲנָיָיה. הָתִיבוֹן. הֲרֵי חָמֵץ בַּפֶּסַח. חָמֵץ יֵשׁ בּוֹ כָרֵת וְאֵילּוּ אֵין בָּהֶן כָּרֵת.

Why did we not state carcasses with them? Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Abun said, it did state only things forbidden for usufruct. Carcass meat is permitted for usufruct. They objected, is there not leavened matter on Passover? Leavened matter makes liable to extirpation, but for these there is no extirpation.

רִבִּי יוֹסֵי בְשֵׁם רִבִּי חֲנִינָה בָעֵי. אִיסּוּרֵי הֲנָיָיה מָהוּ שֶׁיִּבָּטְלוּ (בְּצֵירוּף) [בְּטֵירוּף]. וְהָתַנִּינָן שׂוֹר הַנִּסְקַל. תִּיפְתָר בַּחֲתִיכוֹת. וְהָתַנִּינָן צִּיפֳּרֵי מְצוֹרָע. תִּיפְתָּר צִּיפּוֹר בַּצִּיפֳּרִין. וְהָתַנִּינָן שֵׂיעָר נָזִיר. אִית לָךְ מֵימַר צִּיפּוֹר בַּצִּיפֳּרִין. כַּד מַטּוּן לְעָרְלָה הָתִיב רִבִּי יַעֲקֹב קוֹמֵי רִבִּי יוֹסֵי. וְהָתַנִּינָן הָאוֹרֵג מְלֹא הַסִּיט מִצֶּמֶר בְּכוֹר בַּבֶּגֶד יִדָּלֵק הַבֶּגֶד. מִשֵּׂיעָר נָזִיר מִפֶּטֶר חֲמוֹר בַּשַּׂק יִדָּלֵק הַשַּׂק. אֲמַר לֵיהּ. אִילּוּ אֲמַר תַּנָּא קַמָּן אִיתְיָיהִיבַת יְאוּת.

Rebbi Yose asked in the name of Rebbi Ḥanina: May prohibitions of usufruct become insignificant in (combination) [by being shredded]? But did we not state “the ox which was stoned”? Explain it in pieces. But did we not state “the birds of the sufferer from skin disease”? Explain it as a bird among birds. But did we not state “the nazir’s hair”? Can you say a bird among birds? When they came to study `Orlah did Rebbi Jacob object before Rebbi Yose, did we not state, “if somebody weaves the length of a sīt of firstling’s wool, the cloth must be burned. Of nazir’s hair or firstling donkey in sackcloth, the sackcloth must be burned.” He told him, (if the Tanna had said before us, you would have given) correctly.