Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin 8.4

משנה: הָיָה אָבִיו רוֹצֶה וְאִמּוֹ אֵינָהּ רוֹצָה אָבִיו אֵינוֹ רוֹצֶה וְאִמּוֹ רוֹצָה אֵינוֹ נַעֲשֶׂה בֵן סוֹרֵר וּמוֹרֶה עַד שֶׁיְּהוּ שְׁנֵיהֶם רוֹצִים. רִבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר אִם לֹא הָיְתָה אִמּוֹ רְאוּיָה לְאָבִיו אֵינוֹ נַעֲשֶׂה בֵן סוֹרֵר וּמוֹרֶה.

MISHNAH: If his father was willing but not his mother, or his father unwilling but his mother willing, he cannot be treated as deviant and rebellious son unless both be willing. Rebbi Jehudah says if his mother was inappropriate for his father, he cannot be treated as deviant and rebellious son.

הלכה: הָיָה אָבִיו רוֹצֶה כול׳. אָמַר רִבִּי יוֹחָנָן. וַאֲפִילוּ אֵין אִמּוֹ רְאוּיָה לְאָבִיו. וְכָל מַה שֶׁיֵּשׁ לְאִמּוֹ לֹא מִשֶּׁלְּאָבִיו הֵם. אָמַר רִבִּי יוֹסֵי בֵּירִבִּי בּוּן. תִּיפְתָּר בָּהוּ דַּהֲוָת נָסְבָה דִיּוּרִין וְעָבְדָת שֵׁירוּ וְגָנַב מִינְּהוֹן.

HALAKHAH: “If his father was willing,” etc. Rebbi Joḥanan said, even if his mother was not suitable for his father. But is not all of his mother’s property also his father’s? Rebbi Yose ben Abun said, explain it about one who took in lodgers, made repasts, and he stole from there.