Pāli · Sutta Piṭaka (Pāli, Mahāsaṅgīti)Evaṁ vutte, āyasmā ānando bhagavantaṁ etadavoca: “sakkā nu kho, bhante, imesaṁ tiṇṇaṁ puggalānaṁ aparepi tayo puggalā sappaṭibhāgā paññāpetun”ti?
“Sakkā, ānandā”ti bhagavā avoca: “idhāhaṁ, ānanda, ekaccaṁ puggalaṁ evaṁ cetasā ceto paricca pajānāmi: ‘imassa kho puggalassa vijjamānā kusalāpi dhammā akusalāpi dhammā’ti. Tamenaṁ aparena samayena evaṁ cetasā ceto paricca pajānāmi: ‘imassa kho puggalassa kusalā dhammā antarahitā, akusalā dhammā sammukhībhūtā. Atthi ca khvassa kusalamūlaṁ asamucchinnaṁ, tampi sabbena sabbaṁ samugghātaṁ gacchati. Evamayaṁ puggalo āyatiṁ parihānadhammo bhavissatī’ti. Seyyathāpi, ānanda, aṅgārāni ādittāni sampajjalitāni sajotibhūtāni puthusilāya nikkhittāni. Jāneyyāsi tvaṁ, ānanda, nayimāni aṅgārāni vuddhiṁ virūḷhiṁ vepullaṁ āpajjissantī”ti?
“Evaṁ, bhante”.
“Seyyathāpi vā pana, ānanda, sāyanhasamayaṁ sūriye ogacchante, jāneyyāsi tvaṁ, ānanda, āloko antaradhāyissati andhakāro pātubhavissatī”ti?
“Evaṁ, bhante”.
“Seyyathāpi vā, panānanda, abhido addharattaṁ bhattakālasamaye, jāneyyāsi tvaṁ, ānanda, āloko antarahito andhakāro pātubhūto”ti?
“Evaṁ, bhante”.
“Evamevaṁ kho ahaṁ, ānanda, idhekaccaṁ puggalaṁ evaṁ cetasā ceto paricca pajānāmi: ‘imassa kho puggalassa vijjamānā kusalāpi dhammā akusalāpi dhammā’ti. Tamenaṁ aparena samayena evaṁ cetasā ceto paricca pajānāmi: ‘imassa kho puggalassa kusalā dhammā antarahitā, akusalā dhammā sammukhībhūtā. Atthi ca khvassa kusalamūlaṁ asamucchinnaṁ, tampi sabbena sabbaṁ samugghātaṁ gacchati. Evamayaṁ puggalo āyatiṁ parihānadhammo bhavissatī’ti. Evampi kho, ānanda, tathāgatassa purisapuggalo cetasā ceto paricca vidito hoti. Evampi kho, ānanda, tathāgatassa purisindriyañāṇaṁ cetasā ceto paricca viditaṁ hoti. Evampi kho, ānanda, tathāgatassa āyatiṁ dhammasamuppādo cetasā ceto paricca vidito hoti.
English · Bhikkhu SujatoWhen he said this, Venerable Ānanda said to the Buddha, “Sir, can you describe three other individuals who share a portion of these three?”
“I can, Ānanda,” said the Buddha. “Ānanda, when I’ve comprehended the mind of an individual, I understand: ‘Both skillful and unskillful qualities are found in this individual.’ After some time I encompass their mind and understand: ‘The skillful qualities of this individual have vanished, but the unskillful qualities are still present. Nevertheless, their skillful root is unbroken, but it’s about to be totally destroyed. So this individual is still liable to decline in the future.’ Suppose there were some burning coals, blazing and glowing, placed on a broad rock. Wouldn’t you know that those coals would not grow, increase, and spread?”
“Yes, sir.”
“Or suppose it’s the late afternoon and the sun was going down. Wouldn’t you know that the light was about to vanish and darkness appear?”
“Yes, sir.”
“Or suppose that it’s nearly time for the midnight meal. Wouldn’t you know that the light had vanished and the darkness appeared?”
“Yes, sir.”
“In the same way, when I’ve comprehended the mind of an individual, I understand … This individual is still liable to decline in the future …