Pvr 5

5. Samathabheda 1. Adhikaraṇapariyāyavāra

Vivādādhikaraṇassa— kiṁ pubbaṅgamaṁ? Kati ṭhānāni? Kati vatthūni? Kati bhūmiyo? Kati hetū? Kati mūlāni? Katihākārehi vivadati? Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammati?

The legal issues and their settling 1. The section with a succession on legal issues

In regard to legal issues arising from disputes: What is the forerunner? How many reasons are there? How many grounds? How many foundations? How many causes? How many roots? Through how many motives does one dispute? Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from disputes settled?

Anuvādādhikaraṇassa— kiṁ pubbaṅgamaṁ? Kati ṭhānāni? Kati vatthūni? Kati bhūmiyo? Kati hetū? Kati mūlāni? Katihākārehi anuvadati? Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammati?

In regard to legal issues arising from accusations: What is the forerunner? How many reasons are there? How many grounds? How many foundations? How many causes? How many roots? Through how many motives does one accuse? Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from accusations settled?

Āpattādhikaraṇassa— kiṁ pubbaṅgamaṁ? Kati ṭhānāni? Kati vatthūni? Kati bhūmiyo? Kati hetū? Kati mūlāni? Katihākārehi āpattiṁ āpajjati? Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammati?

In regard to legal issues arising from offenses: What is the forerunner? How many reasons are there? How many grounds? How many foundations? How many causes? How many roots? Through how many motives does one commit an offense? Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from offenses settled?

Kiccādhikaraṇassa— kiṁ pubbaṅgamaṁ? Kati ṭhānāni? Kati vatthūni? Kati bhūmiyo? Kati hetū? Kati mūlāni? Katihākārehi kiccaṁ jāyati? Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammati?

In regard to legal issues arising from business: What is the forerunner? How many reasons are there? How many grounds? How many foundations? How many causes? How many roots? Through how many motives does one give rise to business? Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from business settled?

Vivādādhikaraṇassa kiṁ pubbaṅgamanti? Lobho pubbaṅgamo, doso pubbaṅgamo, moho pubbaṅgamo, alobho pubbaṅgamo, adoso pubbaṅgamo, amoho pubbaṅgamo. Kati ṭhānānīti? Aṭṭhārasa bhedakaravatthūni ṭhānāni. Kati vatthūnīti? Aṭṭhārasa bhedakaravatthūni. Kati bhūmiyoti? Aṭṭhārasa bhedakaravatthūni bhūmiyo. Kati hetūti? Nava hetū— tayo kusalahetū, tayo akusalahetū, tayo abyākatahetū. Kati mūlānīti? Dvādasa mūlāni. Katihākārehi vivadatīti? Dvīhākārehi vivadati— dhammadiṭṭhi vā adhammadiṭṭhi vā. Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammatīti? Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ dvīhi samathehi sammati— sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca.

“What is the forerunner of legal issues arising from disputes?” Desire is a forerunner, ill will is a forerunner, confusion is a forerunner, non-desire is a forerunner, non-ill will is a forerunner, non-confusion is a forerunner. “How many reasons are there?” The eighteen grounds for schism. “How many grounds are there?” The eighteen grounds for schism. “How many foundations are there?” The eighteen grounds for schism. “How many causes are there?” Nine: there are three wholesome causes, three unwholesome causes, and three indeterminate causes. “How many roots are there?” Twelve. “Through how many motives does one dispute?” Through two: through a view that accords with the Teaching or through a view that is contrary to the Teaching. “Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from disputes settled?” Through two of them: through resolution face-to-face and through majority decision.

Anuvādādhikaraṇassa kiṁ pubbaṅgamanti? Lobho pubbaṅgamo, doso pubbaṅgamo, moho pubbaṅgamo, alobho pubbaṅgamo, adoso pubbaṅgamo, amoho pubbaṅgamo. Kati ṭhānānīti? Catasso vipattiyo ṭhānāni. Kati vatthūnīti? Catasso vipattiyo vatthūni. Kati bhūmiyoti? Catasso vipattiyo bhūmiyo. Kati hetūti? Nava hetū— tayo kusalahetū, tayo akusalahetū, tayo abyākatahetū. Kati mūlānīti? Cuddasa mūlāni. Katihākārehi anuvadatīti? Dvīhākārehi anuvadati— vatthuto vā āpattito vā. Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammatīti? Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ catūhi samathehi sammati— sammukhāvinayena ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca.

“What is the forerunner of legal issues arising from accusations?” Desire is a forerunner, ill will is a forerunner, confusion is a forerunner, non-desire is a forerunner, non-ill will is a forerunner, non-confusion is a forerunner. “How many reasons are there?” The four failures. “How many grounds are there?” The four failures. “How many foundations are there?” The four failures. “How many causes are there?” Nine: there are three wholesome causes, three unwholesome causes, and three indeterminate causes. “How many roots are there?” Fourteen. “Through how many motives does one accuse?” Through two: through action or through offense. “Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from accusations settled?” Through four of them: through resolution face-to-face, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through further penalty.

Āpattādhikaraṇassa kiṁ pubbaṅgamanti? Lobho pubbaṅgamo, doso pubbaṅgamo, moho pubbaṅgamo, alobho pubbaṅgamo, adoso pubbaṅgamo, amoho pubbaṅgamo. Kati ṭhānānīti? Satta āpattikkhandhā ṭhānāni. Kati vatthūnīti? Satta āpattikkhandhā vatthūni. Kati bhūmiyoti? Satta āpattikkhandhā bhūmiyo. Kati hetūti? Cha hetū— tayo akusalahetū, tayo abyākatahetū. Kati mūlānīti? Cha āpattisamuṭṭhānāni mūlāni. Katihākārehi āpattiṁ āpajjatīti? Chahākārehi āpattiṁ āpajjati— alajjitā, aññāṇatā, kukkuccapakatatā, akappiye kappiyasaññitā, kappiye akappiyasaññitā, satisammosā. Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammatīti? Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ tīhi samathehi sammati— sammukhāvinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca, sammukhāvinayena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

“What is the forerunner of legal issues arising from offenses?” Desire is a forerunner, ill will is a forerunner, confusion is a forerunner, non-desire is a forerunner, non-ill will is a forerunner, non-confusion is a forerunner. “How many reasons are there?” The seven classes of offenses. “How many grounds are there?” The seven classes of offenses. “How many foundations are there?” The seven classes of offenses. “How many causes are there?” Six: three unwholesome causes and three indeterminate causes. “How many roots are there?” The six originations of offenses. “Through how many motives does one commit an offense?” Through six: through shamelessness, through ignorance, through being overcome by anxiety, through perceiving what is unallowable as allowable, through perceiving what is allowable as unallowable, through absentmindedness. “Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from offenses settled?” Through three of them: through resolution face-to-face and through acting according to what has been admitted, and through resolution face-to-face and through covering over as if with grass.

Kiccādhikaraṇassa kiṁ pubbaṅgamanti? Lobho pubbaṅgamo, doso pubbaṅgamo, moho pubbaṅgamo, alobho pubbaṅgamo, adoso pubbaṅgamo, amoho pubbaṅgamo. Kati ṭhānānīti? Cattāri kammāni ṭhānāni. Kati vatthūnīti? Cattāri kammāni vatthūni. Kati bhūmiyoti? Cattāri kammāni bhūmiyo. Kati hetūti? Nava hetū— tayo kusalahetū, tayo akusalahetū, tayo abyākatahetū. Kati mūlānīti? Ekaṁ mūlaṁ— saṅgho. Katihākārehi kiccaṁ jāyatīti? Dvīhākārehi kiccaṁ jāyati— ñattito vā apalokanato vā. Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammatīti? Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ ekena samathena sammati— sammukhāvinayena.

“What is the forerunner of legal issues arising from business?” Desire is a forerunner, ill will is a forerunner, confusion is a forerunner, non-desire is a forerunner, non-ill will is a forerunner, non-confusion is a forerunner. “How many reasons are there?” The four legal procedures. “How many grounds are there?” The four legal procedures. “How many foundations are there?” The four legal procedures. “How many causes are there?” Nine: there are three wholesome causes, three unwholesome causes, and three indeterminate causes. “How many roots are there?” One: The Sangha. “Through how many motives does one give rise to business?” Through two: through a motion or through getting permission. “Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from business settled?” Through one: through resolution face-to-face.

Kati samathā? Satta samathā. Sammukhāvinayo, sativinayo, amūḷhavinayo, paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, yebhuyyasikā, tassapāpiyasikā, tiṇavatthārako— ime satta samathā.

How many principles for settling are there? Seven: resolution face-to-face, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, majority decision, further penalty, and covering over as if with grass.

Siyā ime satta samathā dasa samathā honti, dasa samathā satta samathā honti vatthuvasena pariyāyena? Siyāti.

With a different presentation, might the seven principles for settling become ten, and the ten become seven? They might.

Kathañca siyā? Vivādādhikaraṇassa dve samathā, anuvādādhikaraṇassa cattāro samathā, āpattādhikaraṇassa tayo samathā, kiccādhikaraṇassa eko samatho. Evaṁ ime satta samathā dasa samathā honti, dasa samathā satta samathā honti vatthuvasena pariyāyena.

How? Legal issues arising from disputes are settled through two principles, legal issues arising from accusations are settled through four principles, legal issues arising from offenses are settled through three principles, legal issues arising from business are settled through one principle. In this way, the seven principles for settling become ten, and the ten become seven.

2. Sādhāraṇavāra

Kati samathā vivādādhikaraṇassa sādhāraṇā? Kati samathā vivādādhikaraṇassa asādhāraṇā? Kati samathā anuvādādhikaraṇassa sādhāraṇā? Kati samathā anuvādādhikaraṇassa asādhāraṇā? Kati samathā āpattādhikaraṇassa sādhāraṇā? Kati samathā āpattādhikaraṇassa asādhāraṇā? Kati samathā kiccādhikaraṇassa sādhāraṇā? Kati samathā kiccādhikaraṇassa asādhāraṇā?

2. The section on “in common”

How many of the principles for settling legal issues arising from disputes do the monks and the nuns have in common? How many do they not have in common? How many of the principles for settling legal issues arising from accusations do the monks and the nuns have in common? How many do they not have in common? How many of the principles for settling legal issues arising from offenses do the monks and the nuns have in common? How many do they not have in common? How many of the principles for settling legal issues arising from business do the monks and the nuns have in common? How many do they not have in common?

Dve samathā vivādādhikaraṇassa sādhāraṇā— sammukhāvinayo, yebhuyyasikā. Pañca samathā vivādādhikaraṇassa asādhāraṇā— sativinayo, amūḷhavinayo, paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, tassapāpiyasikā, tiṇavatthārako.

They have two principles for settling legal issues arising from disputes in common: resolution face-to-face and majority decision. And they have five not in common: resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, further penalty, and covering over as if with grass.

Cattāro samathā anuvādādhikaraṇassa sādhāraṇā— sammukhāvinayo, sativinayo, amūḷhavinayo, tassapāpiyasikā. Tayo samathā anuvādādhikaraṇassa asādhāraṇā— yebhuyyasikā, paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, tiṇavatthārako.

They have four principles for settling legal issues arising from accusations in common: resolution face-to-face, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, and further penalty. And they have three not in common: majority decision, acting according to what has been admitted, and covering over as if with grass.

Tayo samathā āpattādhikaraṇassa sādhāraṇā— sammukhāvinayo, paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, tiṇavatthārako. Cattāro samathā āpattādhikaraṇassa asādhāraṇā— yebhuyyasikā, sativinayo, amūḷhavinayo, tassapāpiyasikā.

They have three principles for settling legal issues arising from offenses in common: resolution face-to-face, acting according to what has been admitted, and covering over as if with grass. And they have four not in common: majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, and further penalty.

Eko samatho kiccādhikaraṇassa sādhāraṇo— sammukhāvinayo. Cha samathā kiccādhikaraṇassa asādhāraṇā— yebhuyyasikā, sativinayo, amūḷhavinayo, paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, tassapāpiyasikā, tiṇavatthārako.

They have one principle for settling legal issues arising from business in common: resolution face-to-face. And they have six not in common: majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, further penalty, and covering over as if with grass.

3. Tabbhāgiyavāra

Kati samathā vivādādhikaraṇassa tabbhāgiyā? Kati samathā vivādādhikaraṇassa aññabhāgiyā? Kati samathā anuvādādhikaraṇassa tabbhāgiyā? Kati samathā anuvādādhikaraṇassa aññabhāgiyā? Kati samathā āpattādhikaraṇassa tabbhāgiyā? Kati samathā āpattādhikaraṇassa aññabhāgiyā? Kati samathā kiccādhikaraṇassa tabbhāgiyā? Kati samathā kiccādhikaraṇassa aññabhāgiyā?

3. The section on “belonging to that”

How many principles for settling are there that belong to legal issues arising from disputes? How many belong to something else? How many principles for settling are there that belong to legal issues arising from accusations? How many belong to something else? How many principles for settling are there that belong to legal issues arising from offenses? How many belong to something else? How many principles for settling are there that belong to legal issues arising from business? How many belong to something else?

Dve samathā vivādādhikaraṇassa tabbhāgiyā— sammukhāvinayo, yebhuyyasikā. Pañca samathā vivādādhikaraṇassa aññabhāgiyā— sativinayo, amūḷhavinayo, paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, tassapāpiyasikā, tiṇavatthārako.

There are two principles for settling that belong to legal issues arising from disputes: resolution face-to-face and majority decision. And there are five that belong to something else: resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, further penalty, and covering over as if with grass.

Cattāro samathā anuvādādhikaraṇassa tabbhāgiyā— sammukhāvinayo, sativinayo, amūḷhavinayo, tassapāpiyasikā. Tayo samathā anuvādādhikaraṇassa aññabhāgiyā— yebhuyyasikā, paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, tiṇavatthārako.

There are four principles for settling that belong to legal issues arising from accusations: resolution face-to-face, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, and further penalty. And there are three that belong to something else: majority decision, acting according to what has been admitted, and covering over as if with grass.

Tayo samathā āpattādhikaraṇassa tabbhāgiyā— sammukhāvinayo, paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, tiṇavatthārako. Cattāro samathā āpattādhikaraṇassa aññabhāgiyā— yebhuyyasikā, sativinayo, amūḷhavinayo, tassapāpiyasikā.

There are three principles for settling that belong to legal issues arising from offenses: resolution face-to-face, acting according to what has been admitted, and covering over as if with grass. And there are four that belong to something else: majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, and further penalty.

Eko samatho kiccādhikaraṇassa tabbhāgiyo— sammukhāvinayo. Cha samathā kiccādhikaraṇassa aññabhāgiyā— yebhuyyasikā, sativinayo, amūḷhavinayo, paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, tassapāpiyasikā, tiṇavatthārako.

There is one principle for settling that belongs to legal issues arising from business: resolution face-to-face. And there are six that belong to something else: majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, further penalty, and covering over as if with grass.

4. Samathāsamathassasādhāraṇavāra

Samathā samathassa sādhāraṇā, samathā samathassa asādhāraṇā. Siyā samathā samathassa sādhāraṇā, siyā samathā samathassa asādhāraṇā.

4. The section on different principles for settling used in common

One principle for settling is used in common with another principle for settling, and one principle for settling is not used in common with another principle for settling. It may be that one principle for settling is used in common with another principle for settling, and it may be that one principle for settling is not used in common with another principle for settling.

Kathaṁ siyā samathā samathassa sādhāraṇā? Kathaṁ siyā samathā samathassa asādhāraṇā? Yebhuyyasikā sammukhāvinayassa sādhāraṇā, sativinayassa amūḷhavinayassa paṭiññātakaraṇassa tassapāpiyasikāya tiṇavatthārakassa asādhāraṇā.

How may it be that one principle for settling is used in common with another principle for settling? How may it be that one principle for settling is not used in common with another principle for settling? Majority decision is used in common with resolution face-to-face. It is not used in common with resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, further penalty, or covering over as if with grass.

Sativinayo sammukhāvinayassa sādhāraṇo, amūḷhavinayassa paṭiññātakaraṇassa tassapāpiyasikāya tiṇavatthārakassa yebhuyyasikāya asādhāraṇo.

Resolution through recollection is used in common with resolution face-to-face. It is not used in common with resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, further penalty, covering over as if with grass, or majority decision.

Amūḷhavinayo sammukhāvinayassa sādhāraṇo, paṭiññātakaraṇassa tassapāpiyasikāya tiṇavatthārakassa yebhuyyasikāya sativinayassa asādhāraṇo.

Resolution because of past insanity is used in common with resolution face-to-face. It is not used in common with acting according to what has been admitted, further penalty, covering over as if with grass, majority decision, or resolution through recollection.

Paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ sammukhāvinayassa sādhāraṇaṁ, tassapāpiyasikāya tiṇavatthārakassa yebhuyyasikāya sativinayassa amūḷhavinayassa asādhāraṇaṁ.

Acting according to what has been admitted is used in common with resolution face-to-face. It is not used in common with further penalty, covering over as if with grass, majority decision, resolution through recollection, or resolution because of past insanity.

Tassapāpiyasikā sammukhāvinayassa sādhāraṇā, tiṇavatthārakassa yebhuyyasikāya sativinayassa amūḷhavinayassa paṭiññātakaraṇassa asādhāraṇā.

Further penalty is used in common with resolution face-to-face. It is not used in common with covering over as if with grass, majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, or acting according to what has been admitted.

Tiṇavatthārako sammukhāvinayassa sādhāraṇo, yebhuyyasikāya sativinayassa amūḷhavinayassa paṭiññātakaraṇassa tassapāpiyasikāya asādhāraṇo. Evaṁ siyā samathā samathassa sādhāraṇā; evaṁ siyā samathā samathassa asādhāraṇā.

Covering over as if with grass is used in common with resolution face-to-face. It is not used in common with majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, or further penalty.

5. Samathāsamathassatabbhāgiyavāra

Samathā samathassa tabbhāgiyā, samathā samathassa aññabhāgiyā. Siyā samathā samathassa tabbhāgiyā, siyā samathā samathassa aññabhāgiyā.

5. The section on different principles for settling belonging with each other

One principle for settling belongs with another principle for settling, and one principle for settling does not belong with another principle for settling. It may be that one principle for settling belongs with another principle for settling, and it may be that one principle for settling does not belong with another principle for settling.

Kathaṁ siyā samathā samathassa tabbhāgiyā? Kathaṁ siyā samathā samathassa aññabhāgiyā? Yebhuyyasikā sammukhāvinayassa tabbhāgiyā, sativinayassa amūḷhavinayassa paṭiññātakaraṇassa tassapāpiyasikāya tiṇavatthārakassa aññabhāgiyā.

How may it be that one principle for settling belongs with another principle for settling? How may it be that one principle for settling does not belong with another principle for settling? Majority decision belongs with resolution face-to-face. It does not belong with resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, further penalty, or covering over as if with grass.

Sativinayo sammukhāvinayassa tabbhāgiyo, amūḷhavinayassa paṭiññātakaraṇassa tassapāpiyasikāya tiṇavatthārakassa yebhuyyasikāya aññabhāgiyo.

Resolution through recollection belongs with resolution face-to-face. It does not belong with resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, further penalty, covering over as if with grass, or majority decision.

Amūḷhavinayo sammukhāvinayassa tabbhāgiyo, paṭiññātakaraṇassa tassapāpiyasikāya tiṇavatthārakassa yebhuyyasikāya sativinayassa aññabhāgiyo.

Resolution because of past insanity belongs with resolution face-to-face. It does not belong with acting according to what has been admitted, further penalty, covering over as if with grass, majority decision, or resolution through recollection.

Paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ sammukhāvinayassa tabbhāgiyaṁ, tassapāpiyasikāya tiṇavatthārakassa yebhuyyasikāya sativinayassa amūḷhavinayassa aññabhāgiyaṁ.

Acting according to what has been admitted belongs with resolution face-to-face. It does not belong with further penalty, covering over as if with grass, majority decision, resolution through recollection, or resolution because of past insanity.

Tassapāpiyasikā sammukhāvinayassa tabbhāgiyā, tiṇavatthārakassa yebhuyyasikāya sativinayassa amūḷhavinayassa paṭiññātakaraṇassa aññabhāgiyā.

Further penalty belongs with resolution face-to-face. It does not belong with covering over as if with grass, majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, or acting according to what has been admitted.

Tiṇavatthārako sammukhāvinayassa tabbhāgiyo, yebhuyyasikāya sativinayassa amūḷhavinayassa paṭiññātakaraṇassa tassapāpiyasikāya aññabhāgiyo. Evaṁ siyā samathā samathassa tabbhāgiyā, evaṁ siyā samathā samathassa aññabhāgiyā.

Covering over as if with grass belongs with resolution face-to-face. It does not belong with majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, or further penalty.

6. Samathasammukhāvinayavāra

Samatho sammukhāvinayo, sammukhāvinayo samatho? Samatho yebhuyyasikā, yebhuyyasikā samatho? Samatho sativinayo, sativinayo samatho? Samatho amūḷhavinayo, amūḷhavinayo samatho? Samatho paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ samatho? Samatho tassapāpiyasikā, tassapāpiyasikā samatho? Samatho tiṇavatthārako, tiṇavatthārako samatho?

6. The section on “is a principle for settling also resolution face-to-face?”

Is a principle for settling also resolution face-to-face, and is resolution face-to-face also a principle for settling? Is a principle for settling also a majority decision, and is a majority decision also a principle for settling? Is a principle for settling also resolution through recollection, and is resolution through recollection also a principle for settling? Is a principle for settling also resolution because of past insanity, and is resolution because of past insanity also a principle for settling? Is a principle for settling also acting according to what has been admitted, and is acting according to what has been admitted also a principle for settling? Is a principle for settling also a further penalty, and is a further penalty also a principle for settling? Is a principle for settling also covering over as if with grass, and is covering over as if with grass also a principle for settling?

Yebhuyyasikā sativinayo amūḷhavinayo paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ tassapāpiyasikā tiṇavatthārako— ime samathā samathā, no sammukhāvinayo. Sammukhāvinayo samatho ceva sammukhāvinayo ca.

Majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, further penalty, and covering over as if with grass: these principles for settling are principles for settling, but they are not resolution face-to-face. Resolution face-to-face is both a principle for settling and also resolution face-to-face.

Sativinayo amūḷhavinayo paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ tassapāpiyasikā tiṇavatthārako sammukhāvinayo— ime samathā samathā, no yebhuyyasikā. Yebhuyyasikā samatho ceva yebhuyyasikā ca.

Resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, further penalty, covering over as if with grass, and resolution face-to-face: these principles for settling are principles for settling, but they are not majority decision. Majority decision is both a principle for settling and also majority decision.

Amūḷhavinayo paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ tassapāpiyasikā tiṇavatthārako sammukhāvinayo yebhuyyasikā— ime samathā samathā, no sativinayo. Sativinayo samatho ceva sativinayo ca.

Resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, further penalty, covering over as if with grass, resolution face-to-face, and majority decision: these principles for settling are principles for settling, but they are not resolution through recollection. Resolution through recollection is both a principle for settling and also resolution through recollection.

Paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ tassapāpiyasikā tiṇavatthārako sammukhāvinayo yebhuyyasikā sativinayo— ime samathā samathā, no amūḷhavinayo. Amūḷhavinayo samatho ceva amūḷhavinayo ca.

Acting according to what has been admitted, further penalty, covering over as if with grass, resolution face-to-face, majority decision, and resolution through recollection: these principles for settling are principles for settling, but they are not resolution because of past insanity. Resolution because of past insanity is both a principle for settling and also resolution because of past insanity.

Tassapāpiyasikā tiṇavatthārako sammukhāvinayo yebhuyyasikā sativinayo amūḷhavinayo— ime samathā samathā, no paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ. Paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ samatho ceva paṭiññātakaraṇañca.

Further penalty, covering over as if with grass, resolution face-to-face, majority decision, resolution through recollection, and resolution because of past insanity: these principles for settling are principles for settling, but they are not acting according to what has been admitted. Acting according to what has been admitted is both a principle for settling and also acting according to what has been admitted.

Tiṇavatthārako sammukhāvinayo yebhuyyasikā sativinayo amūḷhavinayo paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ— ime samathā samathā, no tassapāpiyasikā. Tassapāpiyasikā samatho ceva tassapāpiyasikā ca.

Covering over as if with grass, resolution face-to-face, majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, and acting according to what has been admitted: these principles for settling are principles for settling, but they are not further penalty. Further penalty is both a principle for settling and also further penalty.

Sammukhāvinayo yebhuyyasikā sativinayo amūḷhavinayo paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ tassapāpiyasikā— ime samathā samathā, no tiṇavatthārako. Tiṇavatthārako samatho ceva tiṇavatthārako ca.

Resolution face-to-face, majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, and further penalty: these principles for settling are principles for settling, but they are not covering over as if with grass. Covering over as if with grass is both a principle for settling and also covering over as if with grass.

7. Vinayavāra

Vinayo sammukhāvinayo, sammukhāvinayo vinayo? Vinayo yebhuyyasikā, yebhuyyasikā vinayo? Vinayo sativinayo, sativinayo vinayo? Vinayo amūḷhavinayo, amūḷhavinayo vinayo? Vinayo paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ vinayo? Vinayo tassapāpiyasikā, tassapāpiyasikā vinayo? Vinayo tiṇavatthārako, tiṇavatthārako vinayo?

7. The section on resolution

Is a resolution also resolution face-to-face, and is resolution face-to-face also a resolution? Is a resolution also a majority decision, and is a majority decision also a resolution? Is a resolution also resolution through recollection, and is resolution through recollection also a resolution? Is a resolution also resolution because of past insanity, and is resolution because of past insanity also a resolution? Is a resolution also acting according to what has been admitted, and is acting according to what has been admitted also a resolution? Is a resolution also a further penalty, and is a further penalty also a resolution? Is a resolution also covering over as if with grass, and is covering over as if with grass also a resolution?

Vinayo siyā sammukhāvinayo siyā na sammukhāvinayo. Sammukhāvinayo vinayo ceva sammukhāvinayo ca.

A resolution may be resolution face-to-face, or it may not be resolution face-to-face. Resolution face-to-face is both a resolution and also resolution face-to-face.

Vinayo siyā yebhuyyasikā, siyā na yebhuyyasikā. Yebhuyyasikā vinayo ceva yebhuyyasikā ca.

A resolution may be a majority decision, or it may not be a majority decision. A majority decision is both a resolution and also a majority decision.

Vinayo siyā sativinayo, siyā na sativinayo. Sativinayo vinayo ceva sativinayo ca.

A resolution may be resolution through recollection, or it may not be resolution through recollection. Resolution through recollection is both a resolution and also resolution through recollection.

Vinayo siyā amūḷhavinayo, siyā na amūḷhavinayo. Amūḷhavinayo vinayo ceva amūḷhavinayo ca.

A resolution may be resolution because of past insanity, or it may not be resolution because of past insanity. Resolution because of past insanity is both a resolution and also resolution because of past insanity.

Vinayo siyā paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, siyā na paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ. Paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ vinayo ceva paṭiññātakaraṇañca.

A resolution may be acting according to what has been admitted, or it may not be acting according to what has been admitted. Acting according to what has been admitted is both a resolution and also acting according to what has been admitted.

Vinayo siyā tassapāpiyasikā, siyā na tassapāpiyasikā. Tassapāpiyasikā vinayo ceva tassapāpiyasikā ca.

A resolution may be a further penalty, or it may not be a further penalty. A further penalty is both a resolution and also a further penalty.

Vinayo siyā tiṇavatthārako, siyā na tiṇavatthārako. Tiṇavatthārako vinayo ceva tiṇavatthārako ca.

A resolution may be covering over as if with grass, or it may not be covering over as if with grass. Covering over as if with grass is both a resolution and also covering over as if with grass.

8. Kusalavāra

Sammukhāvinayo kusalo akusalo abyākato? Yebhuyyasikā kusalā akusalā abyākatā? Sativinayo kusalo akusalo abyākato? Amūḷhavinayo kusalo akusalo abyākato? Paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ kusalaṁ akusalaṁ abyākataṁ? Tassapāpiyasikā kusalā akusalā abyākatā? Tiṇavatthārako kusalo akusalo abyākato?

8. The section on the wholesome

Is resolution face-to-face wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate? Is a majority decision wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate? Is resolution through recollection wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate? Is resolution because of past insanity wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate? Is acting according to what has been admitted wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate? Is a further penalty wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate? Is covering over as if with grass wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate?

Sammukhāvinayo siyā kusalo, siyā abyākato. Natthi sammukhāvinayo akusalo. Yebhuyyasikā siyā kusalā, siyā akusalā, siyā abyākatā. Sativinayo siyā kusalo, siyā akusalo, siyā abyākato. Amūḷhavinayo siyā kusalo, siyā akusalo, siyā abyākato. Paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ siyā kusalaṁ, siyā akusalaṁ, siyā abyākataṁ. Tassapāpiyasikā siyā kusalā, siyā akusalā siyā abyākatā. Tiṇavatthārako siyā kusalo, siyā akusalo, siyā abyākato.

Resolution face-to-face may be wholesome or indeterminate; resolution face-to-face is never unwholesome. A majority decision may be wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate. Resolution through recollection may be wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate. Resolution because of past insanity may be wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate. Acting according to what has been admitted may be wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate. A further penalty may be wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate. Covering over as if with grass, may be wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate.

Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ kusalaṁ akusalaṁ abyākataṁ. Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ kusalaṁ akusalaṁ abyākataṁ. Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ kusalaṁ akusalaṁ abyākataṁ. Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ kusalaṁ akusalaṁ abyākataṁ.

Are legal issues arising from disputes wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate? Are legal issues arising from accusations wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate? Are legal issues arising from offenses wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate? Are legal issues arising from business wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate?

Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ siyā kusalaṁ, siyā akusalaṁ, siyā abyākataṁ. Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ siyā kusalaṁ, siyā akusalaṁ, siyā abyākataṁ. Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ siyā akusalaṁ, siyā abyākataṁ. Natthi āpattādhikaraṇaṁ kusalaṁ. Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ siyā kusalaṁ, siyā akusalaṁ, siyā abyākataṁ.

Legal issues arising from disputes may be wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate. Legal issues arising from accusations may be wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate. Legal issues arising from offenses may be unwholesome or indeterminate; legal issues arising from offenses are never wholesome. Legal issues arising from business may be wholesome, unwholesome, or indeterminate.

9. Yatthavāra, pucchāvāra

Yattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati, tattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati; yattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati, tattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati. Na tattha sativinayo labbhati, na tattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati, na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati, na tattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati, na tattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati.

9. The section on “where”, the section on questioning

Resolution face-to-face is appropriate where majority decision is appropriate. Majority decision is appropriate where resolution face-to-face is appropriate. But there, resolution through recollection is not appropriate, nor is resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, further penalty, or covering over as if with grass.

Yattha sativinayo labbhati, tattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati; yattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati, tattha sativinayo labbhati. Na tattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati, na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati, na tattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati, na tattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati, na tattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati.

Resolution face-to-face is appropriate where resolution through recollection is appropriate. Resolution through recollection is appropriate where resolution face-to-face is appropriate. But there, resolution because of past insanity is not appropriate, nor is acting according to what has been admitted, further penalty, covering over as if with grass, or majority decision.

Yattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati, tattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati; yattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati, tattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati. Na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati, na tattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati, na tattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati, na tattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati, na tattha sativinayo labbhati.

Resolution face-to-face is appropriate where resolution because of past insanity is appropriate. Resolution because of past insanity is appropriate where resolution face-to-face is appropriate. But there, acting according to what has been admitted is not appropriate, nor is further penalty, covering over as if with grass, majority decision, or resolution through recollection.

Yattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati, tattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati; yattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati, tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati. Na tattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati, na tattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati, na tattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati, na tattha sativinayo labbhati, na tattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati.

Resolution face-to-face is appropriate where acting according to what has been admitted is appropriate. Acting according to what has been admitted is appropriate where resolution face-to-face is appropriate. But there, further penalty is not appropriate, nor is covering over as if with grass, majority decision, resolution through recollection, or resolution because of past insanity.

Yattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati, tattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati; yattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati, tattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati. Na tattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati, na tattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati, na tattha sativinayo labbhati, na tattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati, na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati.

Resolution face-to-face is appropriate where further penalty is appropriate. Further penalty is appropriate where resolution face-to-face is appropriate. But there, covering over as if with grass is not appropriate, nor is majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, or acting according to what has been admitted.

Yattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati, tattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati; yattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati, tattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati. Na tattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati, na tattha sativinayo labbhati, na tattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati, na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati, na tattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati.

Resolution face-to-face is appropriate where covering over as if with grass is appropriate. Covering over as if with grass is appropriate where resolution face-to-face is appropriate. But there, majority decision is not appropriate, nor is resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, or further penalty.

Yattha yebhuyyasikā tattha sammukhāvinayo; yattha sammukhāvinayo tattha yebhuyyasikā. Na tattha sativinayo, na tattha amūḷhavinayo, na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, na tattha tassapāpiyasikā, na tattha tiṇavatthārako.

Where there is majority decision, there is resolution face-to-face. Where there is resolution face-to-face, there is majority decision. But there is no resolution through recollection there, nor resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, further penalty, or covering over as if with grass.

Yattha sativinayo tattha sammukhāvinayo; yattha sammukhāvinayo tattha sativinayo. Na tattha amūḷhavinayo, na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, na tattha tassapāpiyasikā, na tattha tiṇavatthārako, na tattha yebhuyyasikā. Sammukhāvinayaṁ kātuna mūlaṁ …pe….

Where there is resolution through recollection, there is resolution face-to-face. Where there is resolution face-to-face, there is resolution through recollection. But there is no resolution because of past insanity there, nor acting according to what has been admitted, further penalty, covering over as if with grass, or majority decision. Resolution face-to-face to be done as the basis …

Yattha tiṇavatthārako tattha sammukhāvinayo; yattha sammukhāvinayo tattha tiṇavatthārako. Na tattha yebhuyyasikā, na tattha sativinayo, na tattha amūḷhavinayo, na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ, na tattha tassapāpiyasikā.

Where there is covering over as if with grass, there is resolution face-to-face. Where there is resolution face-to-face, there is covering over as if with grass. But there is no majority decision there, nor resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, or further penalty.

10. Samathavāra, vissajjanāvāra

Yasmiṁ samaye sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca adhikaraṇaṁ vūpasammati, yattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati tattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati, yattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati tattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati. Na tattha sativinayo labbhati, na tattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati, na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati, na tattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati, na tattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati.

10. The section on settling, the section on responding

On an occasion when a legal issue is being resolved through resolution face-to-face and majority decision, then, where majority decision is appropriate, there resolution face-to-face is appropriate, and where resolution face-to-face is appropriate, there majority decision is appropriate. But there resolution through recollection is not appropriate, nor is resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, further penalty, or covering over as if with grass.

Yasmiṁ samaye sammukhāvinayena ca sativinayena ca adhikaraṇaṁ vūpasammati, yattha sativinayo labbhati tattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati, yattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati tattha sativinayo labbhati. Na tattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati, na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati, na tattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati, na tattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati, na tattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati.

On an occasion when a legal issue is being resolved through resolution face-to-face and resolution through recollection, then, where resolution through recollection is appropriate, there resolution face-to-face is appropriate, and where resolution face-to-face is appropriate, there resolution through recollection is appropriate. But there resolution because of past insanity is not appropriate, nor is acting according to what has been admitted, further penalty, covering over as if with grass, or majority decision.

Yasmiṁ samaye sammukhāvinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca adhikaraṇaṁ vūpasammati, yattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati tattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati, yattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati tattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati. Na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati, na tattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati, na tattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati, na tattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati, na tattha sativinayo labbhati.

On an occasion when a legal issue is being resolved through resolution face-to-face and resolution because of past insanity, then, where resolution because of past insanity is appropriate, there resolution face-to-face is appropriate, and where resolution face-to-face is appropriate, there resolution because of past insanity is appropriate. But there acting according to what has been admitted is not appropriate, nor is further penalty, covering over as if with grass, majority decision, or resolution through recollection.

Yasmiṁ samaye sammukhāvinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca adhikaraṇaṁ vūpasammati, yattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati tattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati, yattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati. Na tattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati, na tattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati, na tattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati, na tattha sativinayo labbhati, na tattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati.

On an occasion when a legal issue is being resolved through resolution face-to-face and acting according to what has been admitted, then, where acting according to what has been admitted is appropriate, there resolution face-to-face is appropriate, and where resolution face-to-face is appropriate, there acting according to what has been admitted is appropriate. But there further penalty is not appropriate, nor is covering over as if with grass, majority decision, resolution through recollection, or resolution because of past insanity.

Yasmiṁ samaye sammukhāvinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca adhikaraṇaṁ vūpasammati, yattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati tattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati, yattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati tattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati. Na tattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati, na tattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati, na tattha sativinayo labbhati, na tattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati, na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati.

On an occasion when a legal issue is being resolved through resolution face-to-face and further penalty, then, where further penalty is appropriate, there resolution face-to-face is appropriate, and where resolution face-to-face is appropriate, there further penalty is appropriate. But there covering over as if with grass is not appropriate, nor is majority decision, resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, or acting according to what has been admitted.

Yasmiṁ samaye sammukhāvinayena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca adhikaraṇaṁ vūpasammati, yattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati tattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati, yattha sammukhāvinayo labbhati tattha tiṇavatthārako labbhati. Na tattha yebhuyyasikā labbhati, na tattha sativinayo labbhati, na tattha amūḷhavinayo labbhati, na tattha paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ labbhati, na tattha tassapāpiyasikā labbhati.

On an occasion when a legal issue is being resolved through resolution face-to-face and covering over as if with grass, then, where covering over as if with grass is appropriate, there resolution face-to-face is appropriate, and where resolution face-to-face is appropriate, there covering over as if with grass is appropriate. But there majority decision is not appropriate, nor is resolution through recollection, resolution because of past insanity, acting according to what has been admitted, or further penalty.

11. Saṁsaṭṭhavāra

Adhikaraṇanti vā samathāti vā ime dhammā saṁsaṭṭhā udāhu visaṁsaṭṭhā? Labbhā ca panimesaṁ dhammānaṁ vinibbhujitvā vinibbhujitvā nānākaraṇaṁ paññāpetunti?

11. The section on connection

“Are ‘legal issue’ and ‘principle for settling’ connected or disconnected? Is it possible to completely separate them and point to their difference?”

Adhikaraṇanti vā samathāti vā ime dhammā visaṁsaṭṭhā, no saṁsaṭṭhā. Labbhā ca panimesaṁ dhammānaṁ vinibbhujitvā vinibbhujitvā nānākaraṇaṁ paññāpetunti. So—“mā hevan”tissa vacanīyo. Adhikaraṇanti vā samathāti vā ime dhammā saṁsaṭṭhā, no visaṁsaṭṭhā. No ca labbhā imesaṁ dhammānaṁ vinibbhujitvā vinibbhujitvā nānākaraṇaṁ paññāpetuṁ. Taṁ kissa hetu? Nanu vuttaṁ bhagavatā— “cattārimāni, bhikkhave, adhikaraṇāni, satta samathā. Adhikaraṇā samathehi sammanti, samathā adhikaraṇehi sammanti. Evaṁ, ime dhammā saṁsaṭṭhā no visaṁsaṭṭhā; no ca labbhā imesaṁ dhammānaṁ vinibbhujitvā vinibbhujitvā nānākaraṇaṁ paññāpetun”ti.

“‘Legal issue’ and ‘principle for settling’ are disconnected, not connected, and it’s possible to completely separate them and point to their difference”: they should be told not to say this. “‘Legal issue’ and ‘principle for settling’ are connected, not disconnected, and it’s impossible to completely separate them and point to their difference. Why’s that? Didn’t the Buddha say that there are four kinds of legal issues and seven principles for settling? Legal issues are settled through the principles for settling; the principles for settling are settled through legal issues. In this way they are connected, not disconnected, and it’s impossible to completely separate them and point to their difference.”

12. Sammativāra

Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammati? Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammati? Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammati? Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammati?

12. The section on settling

Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from disputes settled? Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from accusations settled? Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from offenses settled? Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from business settled?

Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ dvīhi samathehi sammati— sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca.

Legal issues arising from disputes are settled through two principles: through resolution face-to-face and through majority decision.

Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ catūhi samathehi sammati— sammukhāvinayena ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca.

Legal issues arising from accusations are settled through four principles: through resolution face-to-face, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through further penalty.

Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ tīhi samathehi sammati— sammukhāvinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Legal issues arising from offenses are settled through three principles: through resolution face-to-face, through acting according to what has been admitted, and through covering over as if with grass.

Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ ekena samathena sammati— sammukhāvinayena.

Legal issues arising from business are settled through one principle: through resolution face-to-face.

Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca pañcahi samathehi sammanti— sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca.

Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from disputes and legal issues arising from accusations settled? Through five: through resolution face-to-face, through majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through further penalty.

Vivādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Vivādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca catūhi samathehi sammanti— sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from disputes and legal issues arising from offenses settled? Through four: through resolution face-to-face, through majority decision, through acting according to what has been admitted, and through covering over as if with grass.

Vivādādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Vivādādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca dvīhi samathehi sammanti— sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca.

Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from disputes and legal issues arising from business settled? Through two: through resolution face-to-face, and through majority decision.

Anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca chahi samathehi sammanti— sammukhāvinayena ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from accusations and legal issues arising from offenses settled? Through six: through resolution face-to-face, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through further penalty, and through covering over as if with grass.

Anuvādādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Anuvādādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca catūhi samathehi sammanti— sammukhāvinayena ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca.

Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from accusations and legal issues arising from business settled? Through four: through resolution face-to-face, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through further penalty.

Āpattādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Āpattādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca tīhi samathehi sammanti— sammukhāvinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from offenses and legal issues arising from business settled? Through three: through resolution face-to-face, through acting according to what has been admitted, and through covering over as if with grass.

Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca sattahi samathehi sammanti— sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from disputes, legal issues arising from accusations, and legal issues arising from offenses settled? Through seven: through resolution face-to-face, through majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through further penalty, and through covering over as if with grass.

Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca pañcahi samathehi sammanti— sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca.

Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from disputes, legal issues arising from accusations, and legal issues arising from business settled? Through five: through resolution face-to-face, through majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through further penalty.

Anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca chahi samathehi sammanti— sammukhāvinayena ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from accusations, legal issues arising from offenses, and legal issues arising from business settled? Through six: through resolution face-to-face, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through further penalty, and through covering over as if with grass.

Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca sattahi samathehi sammanti— sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from disputes, legal issues arising from accusations, legal issues arising from offenses, and legal issues arising from business settled? Through seven: through resolution face-to-face, through majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through further penalty, and through covering over as if with grass.

13. Sammantinasammantivāra

Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammati, katihi samathehi na sammati? Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammati, katihi samathehi na sammati? Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammati, katihi samathehi na sammati? Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ katihi samathehi sammati, katihi samathehi na sammati?

13. The section on settling and not settling

Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from disputes settled, and through how many principles are they not settled? Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from accusations settled, and through how many principles are they not settled? Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from offenses settled, and through how many principles are they not settled? Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from business settled, and through how many principles are they not settled?

Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ dvīhi samathehi sammati— sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca. Pañcahi samathehi na sammati— sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Legal issues arising from disputes are settled through two principles: through resolution face-to-face, and through majority decision. It is not settled through five principles: through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through further penalty, and through covering over as if with grass.

Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ catūhi samathehi sammati— sammukhāvinayena ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca. Tīhi samathehi na sammati— yebhuyyasikāya ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Legal issues arising from accusations are settled through four principles: through resolution face-to-face, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through further penalty. It is not settled through three principles: through majority decision, through acting according to what has been admitted, and through covering over as if with grass.

Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ tīhi samathehi sammati— sammukhāvinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca. Catūhi samathehi na sammati— yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca.

Legal issues arising from offenses are settled through three principles: through resolution face-to-face, through acting according to what has been admitted, and through covering over as if with grass. It is not settled through four principles: through majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through further penalty.

Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ ekena samathena sammati— sammukhāvinayena. Chahi samathehi na sammati— yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Legal issues arising from business are settled through one principle: through resolution face-to-face. It is not settled through six principles: through majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through further penalty, and through covering over as if with grass.

Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Katihi samathehi na sammanti? Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca pañcahi samathehi sammanti— sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca. Dvīhi samathehi na sammanti— paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from disputes and legal issues arising from accusations settled? Through how many principles are they not settled? They are settled through five principles: through resolution face-to-face, through majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through further penalty. They are not settled through two principles: through acting according to what has been admitted, and through covering over as if with grass.

Vivādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Katihi samathehi na sammanti? Vivādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca catūhi samathehi sammanti— sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca. Tīhi samathehi na sammanti— sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca.

Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from disputes and legal issues arising from offenses settled? Through how many principles are they not settled? They are settled through four principles: through resolution face-to-face, through majority decision, through acting according to what has been admitted, and through covering over as if with grass. They are not settled through three principles: through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through further penalty.

Vivādādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Katihi samathehi na sammanti? Vivādādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca dvīhi samathehi sammanti— sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca. Pañcahi samathehi na sammanti— sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from disputes and legal issues arising from business settled? Through how many principles are they not settled? They are settled through two principles: through resolution face-to-face, and through majority decision. They are not settled through five principles: through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through further penalty, and through covering over as if with grass.

Anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Katihi samathehi na sammanti? Anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca chahi samathehi sammanti— sammukhāvinayena ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca. Ekena samathena na sammanti— yebhuyyasikāya.

Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from accusations and legal issues arising from offenses settled? Through how many principles are they not settled? They are settled through six principles: through resolution face-to-face, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through further penalty, and through covering over as if with grass. They are not settled through one principle: through majority decision.

Anuvādādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Katihi samathehi na sammanti? Anuvādādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca catūhi samathehi sammanti— sammukhāvinayena ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca. Tīhi samathehi na sammanti— yebhuyyasikāya ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from accusations and legal issues arising from business settled? Through how many principles are they not settled? They are settled through four principles: through resolution face-to-face, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through further penalty. They are not settled through three principles: through majority decision, through acting according to what has been admitted, and through covering over as if with grass.

Āpattādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Katihi samathehi na sammanti? Āpattādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca tīhi samathehi sammanti— sammukhāvinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca. Catūhi samathehi na sammanti— yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca.

Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from offenses and legal issues arising from business settled? Through how many principles are they not settled? They are settled through three principles: through resolution face-to-face, through acting according to what has been admitted, and through covering over as if with grass. They are not settled through four principles: through majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through further penalty.

Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Katihi samathehi na sammanti? Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca sattahi samathehi sammanti— ammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from disputes, legal issues arising from accusations, and legal issues arising from offenses settled? Through how many principles are they not settled? They are settled through seven principles: through resolution face-to-face, through majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through further penalty, and through covering over as if with grass.

Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Katihi samathehi na sammanti? Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca pañcahi samathehi sammanti— sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca. Dvīhi samathehi na sammanti— paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from disputes, legal issues arising from accusations, and legal issues arising from business settled? Through how many principles are they not settled? They are settled through five principles: through resolution face-to-face, through majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through further penalty. They are not settled through two principles: through acting according to what has been admitted, and through covering over as if with grass.

Anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Katihi samathehi na sammanti? Anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca chahi samathehi sammanti— sammukhāvinayena ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca. Ekena samathena na sammanti— yebhuyyasikāya.

Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from accusations, legal issues arising from offenses, and legal issues arising from business settled? Through how many principles are they not settled? They are settled through six principles: through resolution face-to-face, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through further penalty, and through covering over as if with grass. They are not settled through one principle: through majority decision.

Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca katihi samathehi sammanti? Katihi samathehi na sammanti? Vivādādhikaraṇañca anuvādādhikaraṇañca āpattādhikaraṇañca kiccādhikaraṇañca sattahi samathehi sammanti— sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Through how many principles for settling are legal issues arising from disputes, legal issues arising from accusations, legal issues arising from offenses, and legal issues arising from business settled? Through how many principles are they not settled? They are settled through seven principles: through resolution face-to-face, through majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through further penalty, and through covering over as if with grass.

14. Samathādhikaraṇavāra

Samathā samathehi sammanti? Samathā adhikaraṇehi sammanti? Adhikaraṇā samathehi sammanti? Adhikaraṇā adhikaraṇehi sammanti?

14. The section on principles for settling and legal issues

Are principles for settling settled through principles for settling? Are principles for settling settled through legal issues? Are legal issues settled through principles for settling? Are legal issues settled through legal issues?

Siyā samathā samathehi sammanti, siyā samathā samathehi na sammanti. Siyā samathā adhikaraṇehi sammanti, siyā samathā adhikaraṇehi na sammanti. Siyā adhikaraṇā samathehi sammanti, siyā adhikaraṇā samathehi na sammanti. Siyā adhikaraṇā adhikaraṇehi sammanti, siyā adhikaraṇā adhikaraṇehi na sammanti.

It may be that principles for settling are settled through principles for settling; it may be that principles for settling are not settled through principles for settling. It may be that principles for settling are settled through legal issues; it may be that principles for settling are not settled through legal issues. It may be that legal issues are settled through principles for settling; it may be that legal issues are not settled through principles for settling. It may be that legal issues are settled through legal issues; it may be that legal issues are not settled through legal issues.

Kathaṁ siyā samathā samathehi sammanti, kathaṁ siyā samathā samathehi na sammanti? Yebhuyyasikā sammukhāvinayena sammati; sativinayena na sammati, amūḷhavinayena na sammati, paṭiññātakaraṇena na sammati, tassapāpiyasikāya na sammati, tiṇavatthārakena na sammati.

How may it be that principles for settling are settled through principles for settling? And how may it be that principles for settling are not settled through principles for settling? A majority decision is settled through resolution face-to-face. It is not settled through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through further penalty, or through covering over as if with grass.

Sativinayo sammukhāvinayena sammati; amūḷhavinayena na sammati, paṭiññātakaraṇena na sammāti, tassapāpiyasikāya na sammati, tiṇavatthārakena na sammati, yebhuyyasikāya na sammati.

Resolution through recollection is settled through resolution face-to-face. It is not settled through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through further penalty, through covering over as if with grass, or through majority decision.

Amūḷhavinayo sammukhāvinayena sammati; paṭiññātakaraṇena na sammati, tassapāpiyasikāya na sammati, tiṇavatthārakena na sammati, yebhuyyasikāya na sammati, sativinayena na sammati.

Resolution because of past insanity is settled through resolution face-to-face. It is not settled through acting according to what has been admitted, through further penalty, through covering over as if with grass, through majority decision, or through resolution through recollection.

Paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ sammukhāvinayena sammati; tassapāpiyasikāya na sammati, tiṇavatthārakena na sammati, yebhuyyasikāya na sammati, sativinayena na sammati, amūḷhavinayena na sammati.

Acting according to what has been admitted is settled through resolution face-to-face. It is not settled through further penalty, through covering over as if with grass, through majority decision, through resolution through recollection, or through resolution because of past insanity.

Tassapāpiyasikā sammukhāvinayena sammati; tiṇavatthārakena na sammati, yebhuyyasikāya na sammati, sativinayena na sammati, amūḷhavinayena na sammati, paṭiññātakaraṇena na sammati.

A further penalty is settled through resolution face-to-face. It is not settled through covering over as if with grass, through majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, or through acting according to what has been admitted.

Tiṇavatthārako sammukhāvinayena sammati; yebhuyyasikāya na sammati, sativinayena na sammati, amūḷhavinayena na sammati, paṭiññātakaraṇena na sammati, tassapāpiyasikāya na sammati. Evaṁ siyā samathā samathehi sammanti. Evaṁ siyā samathā samathehi na sammanti.

Covering over as if with grass is settled through resolution face-to-face. It is not settled through majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, or through further penalty.

Kathaṁ siyā samathā adhikaraṇehi sammanti, kathaṁ siyā samathā adhikaraṇehi na sammanti? Sammukhāvinayo vivādādhikaraṇena na sammati, anuvādādhikaraṇena na sammati, āpattādhikaraṇena na sammati; kiccādhikaraṇena sammati.

How may it be that principles for settling are settled through legal issues? How may it be that principles for settling are not settled through legal issues? Resolution face-to-face is not settled through a legal issue arising from a dispute, a legal issue arising from an accusation, or a legal issue arising from an offense. It is settled through a legal issue arising from business.

Yebhuyyasikā vivādādhikaraṇena na sammati, anuvādādhikaraṇena na sammati, āpattādhikaraṇena na sammati; kiccādhikaraṇena sammati.

A majority decision is not settled through a legal issue arising from a dispute, a legal issue arising from an accusation, or a legal issue arising from an offense. It is settled through a legal issue arising from business.

Sativinayo vivādādhikaraṇena na sammati, anuvādādhikaraṇena na sammati, āpattādhikaraṇena na sammati; kiccādhikaraṇena sammati.

Resolution through recollection is not settled through a legal issue arising from a dispute, a legal issue arising from an accusation, or a legal issue arising from an offense. It is settled through a legal issue arising from business.

Amūḷhavinayo vivādādhikaraṇena na sammati, anuvādādhikaraṇena na sammati, āpattādhikaraṇena na sammati; kiccādhikaraṇena sammati.

Resolution because of past insanity is not settled through a legal issue arising from a dispute, a legal issue arising from an accusation, or a legal issue arising from an offense. It is settled through a legal issue arising from business.

Paṭiññātakaraṇaṁ vivādādhikaraṇena na sammati, anuvādādhikaraṇena na sammati, āpattādhikaraṇena na sammati; kiccādhikaraṇena sammati.

Acting according to what has been admitted is not settled through a legal issue arising from a dispute, a legal issue arising from an accusation, or a legal issue arising from an offense. It is settled through a legal issue arising from business.

Tassapāpiyasikā vivādādhikaraṇena na sammati, anuvādādhikaraṇena na sammati, āpattādhikaraṇena na sammati; kiccādhikaraṇena sammati.

A further penalty is not settled through a legal issue arising from a dispute, a legal issue arising from an accusation, or a legal issue arising from an offense. It is settled through a legal issue arising from business.

Tiṇavatthārako vivādādhikaraṇena na sammati, anuvādādhikaraṇena na sammati, āpattādhikaraṇena na sammati; kiccādhikaraṇena sammati. Evaṁ siyā samathā adhikaraṇehi sammanti. Evaṁ siyā samathā adhikaraṇehi na sammanti.

Covering over as if with grass is not settled through a legal issue arising from a dispute, a legal issue arising from an accusation, or a legal issue arising from an offense. It is settled through a legal issue arising from business.

Kathaṁ siyā adhikaraṇā samathehi sammanti, kathaṁ siyā adhikaraṇā samathehi na sammanti? Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca sammati; sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca na sammati.

How may it be that legal issues are settled through principles for settling? How may it be that legal issues are not settled through principles for settling? Legal issues arising from disputes are settled through resolution face-to-face and through majority decision. They are not settled through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through further penalty, or through covering over as if with grass.

Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ sammukhāvinayena ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca sammati; yebhuyyasikāya ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca na sammati.

Legal issues arising from accusations are settled through resolution face-to-face, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through further penalty. They are not settled through majority decision, through acting according to what has been admitted, or through covering over as if with grass.

Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ sammukhāvinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca sammati; yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca na sammati.

Legal issues arising from offenses are settled through resolution face-to-face, through acting according to what has been admitted, and through covering over as if with grass. They are not settled through majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, or through further penalty.

Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ sammukhāvinayena sammati; yebhuyyasikāya ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca tiṇavatthārakena ca na sammati. Evaṁ siyā adhikaraṇā samathehi sammanti. Evaṁ siyā adhikaraṇā samathehi na sammanti.

Legal issues arising from business are settled through resolution face-to-face. They are not settled through majority decision, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, through acting according to what has been admitted, through further penalty, or through covering over as if with grass.

Kathaṁ siyā adhikaraṇā adhikaraṇehi sammanti? Kathaṁ siyā adhikaraṇā adhikaraṇehi na sammanti? Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ vivādādhikaraṇena na sammati, anuvādādhikaraṇena na sammati, āpattādhikaraṇena na sammati; kiccādhikaraṇena sammati.

How may it be that legal issues are settled through legal issues? How may it be that legal issues are not settled through legal issues? Legal issues arising from disputes are not settled through legal issues arising from disputes, through legal issues arising from accusations, or through legal issues arising from offenses. They are settled through legal issues arising from business.

Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ vivādādhikaraṇena na sammati, anuvādādhikaraṇena na sammati, āpattādhikaraṇena na sammati; kiccādhikaraṇena sammati.

Legal issues arising from accusations are not settled through legal issues arising from disputes, through legal issues arising from accusations, or through legal issues arising from offenses. They are settled through legal issues arising from business.

Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ vivādādhikaraṇena na sammati, anuvādādhikaraṇena na sammati, āpattādhikaraṇena na sammati; kiccādhikaraṇena sammati.

Legal issues arising from offenses are not settled through legal issues arising from disputes, through legal issues arising from accusations, or through legal issues arising from offenses. They are settled through legal issues arising from business.

Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ vivādādhikaraṇena na sammati, anuvādādhikaraṇena na sammati, āpattādhikaraṇena na sammati; kiccādhikaraṇena sammati. Evaṁ siyā adhikaraṇā adhikaraṇehi sammanti. Evaṁ siyā adhikaraṇā adhikaraṇehi na sammanti.

Legal issues arising from business are not settled through legal issues arising from disputes, through legal issues arising from accusations, or through legal issues arising from offenses. They are settled through legal issues arising from business.

Chāpi samathā cattāropi adhikaraṇā sammukhāvinayena sammanti; sammukhāvinayo na kenaci sammati.

The six principles for settling and the four legal issues are settled through resolution face-to-face. Resolution face-to-face is not settled through anything.

15. Samuṭṭhāpanavāra

Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ samuṭṭhāpeti? Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ na katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ samuṭṭhāpeti; api ca vivādādhikaraṇapaccayā cattāro adhikaraṇā jāyanti. Yathā kathaṁ viya? Idha bhikkhū vivadanti— “dhammo”ti vā, “adhammo”ti vā, “vinayo”ti vā, “avinayo”ti vā, “abhāsitaṁ alapitaṁ tathāgatenā”ti vā, “bhāsitaṁ lapitaṁ tathāgatenā”ti vā, “anāciṇṇaṁ tathāgatenā”ti vā, “āciṇṇaṁ tathāgatenā”ti vā, “apaññattaṁ tathāgatenā”ti vā, “paññattaṁ tathāgatenā”ti vā, “āpattī”ti vā, “anāpattī”ti vā, “lahukā āpattī”ti vā, “garukā āpattī”ti vā, “sāvasesā āpattī”ti vā, “anavasesā āpattī”ti vā, “duṭṭhullā āpattī”ti vā “aduṭṭhullā āpattī”ti vā. Yaṁ tattha bhaṇḍanaṁ kalaho viggaho vivādo nānāvādo aññathāvādo vipaccatāya vohāro medhakaṁ, idaṁ vuccati vivādādhikaraṇaṁ. Vivādādhikaraṇe saṅgho vivadati. Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ vivadamāno anuvadati. Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ anuvadamāno āpattiṁ āpajjati āpattādhikaraṇaṁ. Tāya āpattiyā saṅgho kammaṁ karoti kiccādhikaraṇaṁ. Evaṁ vivādādhikaraṇapaccayā cattāro adhikaraṇā jāyanti.

15. The section on causing to originate

Which of the four legal issues causes legal issues arising from disputes to originate? None of them. Nevertheless, the four legal issues are produced from legal issues arising from disputes. How is that? It may be that monks are disputing, saying, “This is the Teaching”, “This is contrary to the Teaching”, “This is the Monastic Law”, “This is contrary to the Monastic Law”, “This was spoken by the Buddha”, “This wasn’t spoken by the Buddha”, “This was practiced by the Buddha”, “This wasn’t practiced by the Buddha”, “This was laid down by the Buddha”, “This wasn’t laid down by the Buddha”, “This is an offense”, “This isn’t an offense”, “This is a light offense”, “This is a heavy offense”, “This is a curable offense”, “This is an incurable offense”, “This is a grave offense”, or “This is a minor offense.” In regard to this, whatever there is of quarreling, arguing, conflict, disputing, variety in opinion, difference in opinion, heated speech, or strife—this is called a legal issue arising from a dispute. When, during a legal issue arising from a dispute, the Sangha disputes, there is a legal issue arising from a dispute. When one who is disputing makes an accusation, there is a legal issue arising from an accusation. When one who is accusing commits an offense, there is a legal issue arising from an offense. When the Sangha does a legal procedure because of that offense, there is a legal issue arising from business.

Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ samuṭṭhāpeti? Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ na katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ samuṭṭhāpeti; api ca anuvādādhikaraṇapaccayā cattāro adhikaraṇā jāyanti. Yathā kathaṁ viya? Idha bhikkhū bhikkhuṁ anuvadanti sīlavipattiyā vā ācāravipattiyā vā diṭṭhivipattiyā vā ājīvavipattiyā vā. Yo tattha anuvādo anuvadanā anullapanā anubhaṇanā anusampavaṅkatā abbhussahanatā anubalappadānaṁ, idaṁ vuccati anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ. Anuvādādhikaraṇe saṅgho vivadati. Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ vivadamāno anuvadati. Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ anuvadamāno āpattiṁ āpajjati āpattādhikaraṇaṁ. Tāya āpattiyā saṅgho kammaṁ karoti kiccādhikaraṇaṁ. Evaṁ anuvādādhikaraṇapaccayā cattāro adhikaraṇā jāyanti.

Which of the four legal issues causes legal issues arising from accusations to originate? None of them. Nevertheless, the four legal issues are produced from legal issues arising from accusations. How is that? It may be that monks accuse a monk of failure in morality, failure in conduct, failure in view, or failure in livelihood. In regard to this, whatever there is of accusations, accusing, allegations, blame, taking sides because of friendship, taking part in the accusation, or supporting the accusation—this is called a legal issue arising from an accusation. When, during a legal issue arising from an accusation, the Sangha disputes, there is a legal issue arising from a dispute. When one who is disputing makes an accusation, there is a legal issue arising from an accusation. When one who is accusing commits an offense, there is a legal issue arising from an offense. When the Sangha does a legal procedure because of that offense, there is a legal issue arising from business.

Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ samuṭṭhāpeti? Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ na katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ samuṭṭhāpeti; api ca āpattādhikaraṇapaccayā cattāro adhikaraṇā jāyanti. Yathā kathaṁ viya? Pañcapi āpattikkhandhā āpattādhikaraṇaṁ, sattapi āpattikkhandhā āpattādhikaraṇaṁ, idaṁ vuccati āpattādhikaraṇaṁ. Āpattādhikaraṇe saṅgho vivadati. Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ vivadamāno anuvadati. Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ anuvadamāno āpattiṁ āpajjati āpattādhikaraṇaṁ. Tāya āpattiyā saṅgho kammaṁ karoti kiccādhikaraṇaṁ. Evaṁ āpattādhikaraṇapaccayā cattāro adhikaraṇā jāyanti.

Which of the four legal issues causes legal issues arising from offenses to originate? None of them. Nevertheless, the four legal issues are produced from legal issues arising from offenses. How is that? There are legal issues arising from offenses because of the five classes of offenses, and there are legal issues arising from offenses because of the seven classes of offenses—these are called legal issues arising from offenses. When, during a legal issue arising from an offense, the Sangha disputes, there is a legal issue arising from a dispute. When one who is disputing makes an accusation, there is a legal issue arising from an accusation. When one who is accusing commits an offense, there is a legal issue arising from an offense. When the Sangha does a legal procedure because of that offense, there is a legal issue arising from business.

Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ samuṭṭhāpeti? Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ na katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ samuṭṭhāpeti, api ca kiccādhikaraṇapaccayā cattāro adhikaraṇā jāyanti. Yathā kathaṁ viya? Yā saṅghassa kiccayatā karaṇīyatā apalokanakammaṁ ñattikammaṁ ñattidutiyakammaṁ ñatticatutthakammaṁ, idaṁ vuccati kiccādhikaraṇaṁ. Kiccādhikaraṇe saṅgho vivadati. Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ vivadamāno anuvadati. Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ anuvadamāno āpattiṁ āpajjati āpattādhikaraṇaṁ. Tāya āpattiyā saṅgho kammaṁ karoti kiccādhikaraṇaṁ. Evaṁ kiccādhikaraṇapaccayā cattāro adhikaraṇā jāyanti.

Which of the four legal issues causes legal issues arising from business to originate? None of them. Nevertheless, the four legal issues are produced from legal issues arising from business. How is that? Whatever is the duty or the business of the Sangha—a legal procedure consisting of getting permission, a legal procedure consisting of one motion, a legal procedure consisting of one motion and one announcement, a legal procedure consisting of one motion and three announcements—this is called a legal issue arising from business. When, during a legal issue arising from business, the Sangha disputes, there is a legal issue arising from a dispute. When one who is disputing makes an accusation, there is a legal issue arising from an accusation. When one who is accusing commits an offense, there is a legal issue arising from an offense. When the Sangha does a legal procedure because of that offense, there is a legal issue arising from business.

16. Bhajativāra

Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ bhajati? Katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ upanissitaṁ? Katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ pariyāpannaṁ? Katamena adhikaraṇena saṅgahitaṁ?

16. The section on “belonging to”

“To which of the four legal issues do legal issues arising from disputes belong? Which legal issues do they depend on? Which legal issues are they included in? Which legal issues are they grouped with?

Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ bhajati? Katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ upanissitaṁ? Katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ pariyāpannaṁ? Katamena adhikaraṇena saṅgahitaṁ?

To which of the four legal issues do legal issues arising from accusations belong? Which legal issues do they depend on? Which legal issues are they included in? Which legal issues are they grouped with?

Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ bhajati? Katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ upanissitaṁ? Katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ pariyāpannaṁ? Katamena adhikaraṇena saṅgahitaṁ?

To which of the four legal issues do legal issues arising from offenses belong? Which legal issues do they depend on? Which legal issues are they included in? Which legal issues are they grouped with?

Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ bhajati? Katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ upanissitaṁ? Katamaṁ adhikaraṇaṁ pariyāpannaṁ? Katamena adhikaraṇena saṅgahitaṁ?

To which of the four legal issues do legal issues arising from business belong? Which legal issues do they depend on? Which legal issues are they included in? Which legal issues are they grouped with?

Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ vivādādhikaraṇaṁ bhajati, vivādādhikaraṇaṁ upanissitaṁ, vivādādhikaraṇaṁ pariyāpannaṁ, vivādādhikaraṇena saṅgahitaṁ.

Legal issues arising from disputes belong to legal issues arising from disputes; they depend on legal issues arising from disputes; they are included in legal issues arising from disputes; they are grouped with legal issues arising from disputes.

Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ bhajati, anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ upanissitaṁ, anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ pariyāpannaṁ, anuvādādhikaraṇena saṅgahitaṁ.

Legal issues arising from accusations belong to legal issues arising from accusations; they depend on legal issues arising from accusations; they are included in legal issues arising from accusations; they are grouped with legal issues arising from accusations.

Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ āpattādhikaraṇaṁ bhajati, āpattādhikaraṇaṁ upanissitaṁ, āpattādhikaraṇaṁ pariyāpannaṁ, āpattādhikaraṇena saṅgahitaṁ.

Legal issues arising from offenses belong to legal issues arising from offenses; they depend on legal issues arising from offenses; they are included in legal issues arising from offenses; they are grouped with legal issues arising from offenses.

Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ catunnaṁ adhikaraṇānaṁ kiccādhikaraṇaṁ bhajati, kiccādhikaraṇaṁ upanissitaṁ, kiccādhikaraṇaṁ pariyāpannaṁ, kiccādhikaraṇena saṅgahitaṁ.

Legal issues arising from business belong to legal issues arising from business; they depend on legal issues arising from business; they are included in legal issues arising from business; they are grouped with legal issues arising from business.

Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ sattannaṁ samathānaṁ kati samathe bhajati, kati samathe upanissitaṁ, kati samathe pariyāpannaṁ, katihi samathehi saṅgahitaṁ, katihi samathehi sammati?

To how many of the seven principles for settling do legal issues arising from disputes belong? On how many principles for settling do they depend? In how many principles for settling are they included? With how many principles for settling are they grouped? Through how many principles for settling are they settled?

Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ sattannaṁ samathānaṁ kati samathe bhajati, kati samathe upanissitaṁ, kati samathe pariyāpannaṁ, katihi samathehi saṅgahitaṁ, katihi samathehi sammati?

To how many of the seven principles for settling do legal issues arising from accusations belong? On how many principles for settling do they depend? In how many principles for settling are they included? With how many principles for settling are they grouped? Through how many principles for settling are they settled?

Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ sattannaṁ samathānaṁ kati samathe bhajati, kati samathe upanissitaṁ, kati samathe pariyāpannaṁ, katihi samathehi saṅgahitaṁ, katihi samathehi sammati?

To how many of the seven principles for settling do legal issues arising from offenses belong? On how many principles for settling do they depend? In how many principles for settling are they included? With how many principles for settling are they grouped? Through how many principles for settling are they settled?

Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ sattannaṁ samathānaṁ kati samathe bhajati, kati samathe upanissitaṁ, kati samathe pariyāpannaṁ, katihi samathehi saṅgahitaṁ, katihi samathehi sammati?

To how many of the seven principles for settling do legal issues arising from business belong? On how many principles for settling do they depend? In how many principles for settling are they included? With how many principles for settling are they grouped? Through how many principles for settling are they settled?

Vivādādhikaraṇaṁ sattannaṁ samathānaṁ dve samathe bhajati, dve samathe upanissitaṁ, dve samathe pariyāpannaṁ, dvīhi samathehi saṅgahitaṁ, dvīhi samathehi sammati— sammukhāvinayena ca yebhuyyasikāya ca.

Legal issues arising from disputes belong to two principles for settling; they depend on two principles for settling; they are included in two principles for settling; they are grouped with two principles for settling; they are settled through two principles for settling: through resolution face-to-face and through majority decision.

Anuvādādhikaraṇaṁ sattannaṁ samathānaṁ cattāro samathe bhajati, cattāro samathe upanissitaṁ, cattāro samathe pariyāpannaṁ, catūhi samathehi saṅgahitaṁ, catūhi samathehi sammati— sammukhāvinayena ca sativinayena ca amūḷhavinayena ca tassapāpiyasikāya ca.

Legal issues arising from accusations belong to four principles for settling; they depend on four principles for settling; they are included in four principles for settling; they are grouped with four principles for settling; they are settled through four principles for settling: through resolution face-to-face, through resolution through recollection, through resolution because of past insanity, and through further penalty.

Āpattādhikaraṇaṁ sattannaṁ samathānaṁ tayo samathe bhajati, tayo samathe upanissitaṁ, tayo samathe pariyāpannaṁ, tīhi samathehi saṅgahitaṁ tīhi samathehi sammati— sammukhāvinayena ca paṭiññātakaraṇena ca tiṇavatthārakena ca.

Legal issues arising from offenses belong to three principles for settling; they depend on three principles for settling; they are included in three principles for settling; they are grouped with three principles for settling; they are settled through three principles for settling: through resolution face-to-face, through acting according to what has been admitted, and through covering over as if with grass.

Kiccādhikaraṇaṁ sattannaṁ samathānaṁ ekaṁ samathaṁ bhajati, ekaṁ samathaṁ upanissitaṁ, ekaṁ samathaṁ pariyāpannaṁ, ekena samathena saṅgahitaṁ, ekena samathena sammati— sammukhāvinayenāti.

Legal issues arising from business belong to one principle for settling; they depend on one principle for settling; they are included in one principle for settling; they are grouped with one principle for settling; they are settled through one principle for settling: through resolution face-to-face.”