Pāli · Vinaya Piṭaka (Pāli, Mahāsaṅgīti)“Idhupāli, bhikkhu adhammaṁ dhammoti dīpeti. Tasmiṁ adhammadiṭṭhi, bhede adhammadiṭṭhi, vinidhāya diṭṭhiṁ, vinidhāya khantiṁ, vinidhāya ruciṁ, vinidhāya bhāvaṁ, anussāveti, salākaṁ gāheti— ‘ayaṁ dhammo, ayaṁ vinayo, idaṁ satthusāsanaṁ, imaṁ gaṇhatha, imaṁ rocethā’ti. Ayampi kho, upāli, saṅghabhedako āpāyiko, nerayiko, kappaṭṭho, atekiccho.
Puna caparaṁ, upāli, bhikkhu adhammaṁ dhammoti dīpeti. Tasmiṁ adhammadiṭṭhi, bhede dhammadiṭṭhi, vinidhāya diṭṭhiṁ, vinidhāya khantiṁ, vinidhāya ruciṁ, vinidhāya bhāvaṁ, anussāveti, salākaṁ gāheti— ‘ayaṁ dhammo, ayaṁ vinayo, idaṁ satthusāsanaṁ, imaṁ gaṇhatha, imaṁ rocethā’ti. Ayampi kho, upāli, saṅghabhedako āpāyiko, nerayiko, kappaṭṭho, atekiccho.
Puna caparaṁ, upāli, bhikkhu adhammaṁ dhammoti dīpeti. Tasmiṁ adhammadiṭṭhi, bhede vematiko, vinidhāya diṭṭhiṁ, vinidhāya khantiṁ, vinidhāya ruciṁ, vinidhāya bhāvaṁ, anussāveti, salākaṁ gāheti— ‘ayaṁ dhammo, ayaṁ vinayo, idaṁ satthusāsanaṁ, imaṁ gaṇhatha, imaṁ rocethā’ti. Ayampi kho, upāli, saṅghabhedako āpāyiko, nerayiko, kappaṭṭho, atekiccho.
Puna caparaṁ, upāli, bhikkhu adhammaṁ dhammoti dīpeti. Tasmiṁ dhammadiṭṭhi, bhede adhammadiṭṭhi …pe… tasmiṁ dhammadiṭṭhi bhede dhammadiṭṭhi. Tasmiṁ dhammadiṭṭhi bhede vematiko. Tasmiṁ vematiko bhede adhammadiṭṭhi. Tasmiṁ vematiko bhede dhammadiṭṭhi. Tasmiṁ vematiko bhede vematiko vinidhāya diṭṭhiṁ, vinidhāya khantiṁ, vinidhāya ruciṁ, vinidhāya bhāvaṁ, anussāveti, salākaṁ gāheti— ‘ayaṁ dhammo, ayaṁ vinayo, idaṁ satthusāsanaṁ, imaṁ gaṇhatha, imaṁ rocethā’ti. Ayampi kho, upāli, saṅghabhedako āpāyiko, nerayiko, kappaṭṭho, atekiccho.
Puna caparaṁ, upāli, bhikkhu dhammaṁ adhammoti dīpeti …pe… avinayaṁ vinayoti dīpeti … vinayaṁ avinayoti dīpeti … abhāsitaṁ alapitaṁ tathāgatena bhāsitaṁ lapitaṁ tathāgatenāti dīpeti … bhāsitaṁ lapitaṁ tathāgatena abhāsitaṁ alapitaṁ tathāgatenāti dīpeti … anāciṇṇaṁ tathāgatena āciṇṇaṁ tathāgatenāti dīpeti … āciṇṇaṁ tathāgatena anāciṇṇaṁ tathāgatenāti dīpeti … apaññattaṁ tathāgatena paññattaṁ tathāgatenāti dīpeti … paññattaṁ tathāgatena apaññattaṁ tathāgatenāti dīpeti … anāpattiṁ āpattīti dīpeti … āpattiṁ anāpattīti dīpeti … lahukaṁ āpattiṁ garukā āpattīti dīpeti … garukaṁ āpattiṁ lahukā āpattīti dīpeti … sāvasesaṁ āpattiṁ anavasesā āpattīti dīpeti … anavasesaṁ āpattiṁ sāvasesā āpattīti dīpeti … duṭṭhullaṁ āpattiṁ aduṭṭhullā āpattīti dīpeti … aduṭṭhullaṁ āpattiṁ duṭṭhullā āpattīti dīpeti … tasmiṁ adhammadiṭṭhi, bhede adhammadiṭṭhi …pe… tasmiṁ adhammadiṭṭhi, bhede dhammadiṭṭhi … tasmiṁ adhammadiṭṭhi, bhede vematiko … tasmiṁ dhammadiṭṭhi, bhede adhammadiṭṭhi … tasmiṁ dhammadiṭṭhi, bhede dhammadiṭṭhi … tasmiṁ dhammadiṭṭhi, bhede vematiko … tasmiṁ vematiko, bhede adhammadiṭṭhi … tasmiṁ vematiko, bhede dhammadiṭṭhi … tasmiṁ vematiko, bhede vematiko, vinidhāya diṭṭhiṁ, vinidhāya khantiṁ, vinidhāya ruciṁ, vinidhāya bhāvaṁ, anussāveti, salākaṁ gāheti— ‘ayaṁ dhammo, ayaṁ vinayo, idaṁ satthusāsanaṁ, imaṁ gaṇhatha, imaṁ rocethā’ti. Ayampi kho, upāli, saṅghabhedako āpāyiko, nerayiko, kappaṭṭho, atekiccho”ti.
English · Bhikkhu Brahmali“In this case a monk proclaims what’s contrary to the Teaching as being in accordance with it. He has the view that what he says is illegitimate and the view that the schism is illegitimate. He misrepresents his view of what’s true, his belief of what’s true, his acceptance of what’s true, or his sentiment of what’s true. He makes a proclamation and distributes ballots, saying, ‘This is the Teaching, this is the Monastic Law, this is the Teacher’s instruction; take this, approve of this.’ When such a person causes a schism in the Sangha, he’s irredeemably destined to an eon in hell.
Again, a monk proclaims what’s contrary to the Teaching as being in accordance with it. He has the view that what he says is illegitimate, but the view that the schism is legitimate. He misrepresents his view of what’s true, his belief of what’s true, his acceptance of what’s true, or his sentiment of what’s true. He makes a proclamation and distributes ballots, saying, ‘This is the Teaching, this is the Monastic Law, this is the Teacher’s instruction; take this, approve of this.’ When such a person causes a schism in the Sangha, he too is irredeemably destined to an eon in hell.
Again, a monk proclaims what’s contrary to the Teaching as being in accordance with it. He has the view that what he says is illegitimate, but is unsure about the schism. He misrepresents his view of what’s true, his belief of what’s true, his acceptance of what’s true, or his sentiment of what’s true. He makes a proclamation and distributes ballots, saying, ‘This is the Teaching, this is the Monastic Law, this is the Teacher’s instruction; take this, approve of this.’ When such a person causes a schism in the Sangha, he too is irredeemably destined to an eon in hell.
Again, a monk proclaims what’s contrary to the Teaching as being in accordance with it. He has the view that what he says is legitimate, but the view that the schism is illegitimate … He has the view that what he says is legitimate, but is unsure about the schism … He is unsure about what he says, but has the view that the schism is illegitimate … He is unsure about what he says, but has the view that the schism is legitimate … He is unsure about what he says and is unsure about the schism. He misrepresents his view of what’s true, his belief of what’s true, his acceptance of what’s true, or his sentiment of what’s true. He makes a proclamation and distributes ballots, saying, ‘This is the Teaching, this is the Monastic Law, this is the Teacher’s instruction; take this, approve of this.’ When such a person causes a schism in the Sangha, he too is irredeemably destined to an eon in hell.
Again, a monk proclaims what’s in accordance with the Teaching as contrary to it, what’s contrary to the Monastic Law as being in accordance with it, what’s in accordance with the Monastic Law as contrary to it, what hasn’t been spoken by the Buddha as spoken by him, what’s been spoken by the Buddha as not spoken by him, what wasn’t practiced by the Buddha as practiced by him, what was practiced by the Buddha as not practiced by him, what wasn’t laid down by the Buddha as laid down by him, what was laid down by the Buddha as not laid down by him, a non-offense as an offense, an offense as a non-offense, a light offense as heavy, a heavy offense as light, a curable offense as incurable, an incurable offense as curable, a grave offense as minor, or a minor offense as grave. He has the view that what he says is illegitimate and the view that the schism is illegitimate. … He has the view that what he says is illegitimate, but the view that the schism is legitimate. … He has the view that what he says is illegitimate, but is unsure about the schism. … He has the view that what he says is legitimate, but the view that the schism is illegitimate. … He has the view that what he says is legitimate, but is unsure about the schism. … He is unsure about what he says, but has the view that the schism is illegitimate. … He is unsure about what he says, but has the view that the schism is legitimate. … He is unsure about what he says and unsure about the schism. He misrepresents his view of what’s true, his belief of what’s true, his acceptance of what’s true, or his sentiment of what’s true. He makes a proclamation and distributes ballots, saying, ‘This is the Teaching, this is the Monastic Law, this is the Teacher’s instruction; take this, approve of this.’ When such a person causes a schism in the Sangha, he too is irredeemably destined to an eon in hell.”