טוֹב לָלֶכֶת אֶל בֵּית אֵבֶל מִלֶּכֶת אֶל בֵּית מִשְׁתֶּה, לָמָּה שֶׁלֵּב חֲכָמִים בְּבֵית אֵבֶל, שֶׁכָּל מִי שֶׁמִּתְאַבֵּל הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא מְשַׂמְּחוֹ, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (ישעיה כט, יט): וְיָסְפוּ עֲנָוִים בַּה' שִׂמְחָה. דָּבָר אַחֵר, טוֹב לָלֶכֶת אֶל בֵּית אֵבֶל מִלֶּכֶת אֶל בֵּית מִשְׁתֶּה, מוּטָב לָלֶכֶת לְמִדָּה שֶׁיֵּשׁ לָהּ פֵּרָעוֹן, מִמִּדָּה שֶׁאֵין לָהּ פֵּרָעוֹן. מוּטָב לֵילֵךְ בְּמִדָּה נוֹהֶגֶת בַּחַיִּים וּבַמֵּתִים, מִמִּדָּה שֶׁאֵינָה נוֹהֶגֶת אֶלָּא בַּחַיִּים. מוּטָב לֵילֵךְ בְּמִדָּה נוֹהֶגֶת בָּעֲשִׁירִים וּבָעֲנִיִּים, מִמִּדָּה שֶׁאֵינָה נוֹהֶגֶת אֶלָּא בָּעֲשִׁירִים. מוּטָב לֵילֵךְ בְּמִדָּה שֶׁיֵּשׁ בָּהּ פִּיּוּס, מִמִּדָּה שֶׁאֵין בָּהּ פִּיּוּס.
“It is better to go to a house of mourning than to go to a house of feasting; for that is the end of all men, and the living will take it to heart” (Ecclesiastes 7:2). “It is better to go to a house of mourning than to go to a house of feasting.” Why? It is because “the heart of the wise is in a house of mourning” (Ecclesiastes 7:4), as anyone who mourns, the Holy One blessed be He brings him joy, as it is stated: “The humble will increase their joy in the Lord” (Isaiah 29:19). Another matter, “it is better to go to a house of mourning than to go to a house of feasting” – it is better to adopt a mode of conduct for which there is a recompense, than a mode of conduct for which there is no recompense. It is better to adopt a mode of conduct that serves the living and the dead, than a mode of conduct that serves only the living. It is better to adopt a mode of conduct that serves both the wealthy and the poor, than a mode of conduct that serves only the wealthy. It is better to adopt a mode of conduct that involves consolation, than a mode of conduct that does not involve consolation.