Book VI
Now Milinda the king went up to the place where NAgasena was, and bowed down before him, and took his seat on one side. And when so seated, he said to Nagasena: ‘Venerable Nagasena, is there any layman living at home, enjoying the pleasures of sense, occupying a dwelling encumbered with wife and children, enjoying the use of sandal wood from Benares, and of garlands, perfumes, and ointments, accepting gold and silver, with an embroidered head-dress on, set with diamonds and pearls and gold—is there any such who has seen face to face the calm, the supreme good, Nirvana’ ‘Not one hundred only, O king, nor two nor three nor five nor six hundred, not a thousand only, nor a hundred thousand, nor ten millions, nor ten thousand millions, not even only a billion laymen (have seen Nirvana)—not to speak of twenty or thirty or a hundred ora thousand who have attained to clear understanding (of the four Truths)', By I take this to mean, ‘Not to speak of comparatively small numbers who have experienced Abhisamaya, an innumerable host of laymen have reached Nirvana—that is, have reached, and during their lives remained in, the third stage of the Path, and attained Arahatship just before they died. Abhisamaya is used either absolutely or in composition. Manabhisamaya (A. IV, 38, 5=M. I, certainly, and perhaps Atthabhisamaya, is used of Arahats, but they do not occur in our author. He uses occasionally Dhammabhisamaya (see pp. 255, 350, &c., of the Pali) and Katu-sakkabhisamaya (see pp. 171, 334, &c.), but more frequently Abhisamaya absolutely. Dhammabhisamaya, ‘penetration into, clear understanding of, the Dhammas or Dhamma,’ may refer to the four Dhammas of Ahguttara IV, 1 (= M. P.S., IV, 2, 3), or to the comprehension of the qualities (Dhammas) of things, or (what is very much the same) to the comprehension of the principal doctrine (Dhamma) of the impermanence of all things. In the last case it would be the same thing, looked at from a slightly different point of view, as the Dhamma-fakkhu, the Eye for the Truths (see Sumahgala Vilasini I, 237), or as that insight (Vipassana) which is the entrance to the Path. But the four Truths (as to sorrow, &c.) are also important Dhammas, and as the expression Katu-sakkabhisamaya clearly refers to them and them only, this may also be the meaning of dhammabhisamaya, or at any rate of abhisamaya standing above. So at least I take the latter here. We know that the ‘Eye for the Dhamma,’ the perception of the first only of the tiæi lakkhawani (impermanence), implies and involves the entrance into the Path. Oddly enough there is as yet no evidence to show whether the perception of the cardinal doctrine of the four Truths necessarily does so too; or can do so alone, without the Dhamma- /akkhu. If the latter, then there are two gates to the Path. And this is not only quite possible, but is the inference one might fairly draw from the constant phrase ‘After the exposition of the Truths had concluded so and so attained to’ one or other of the phalani. what kind of exposition shall I lay before you evidence showing that I know this??’ ‘Do you yourself tell me *.’